· Private foundation
The James & Edith Spain Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO | $100,000 |
| OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION | $13,000 |
| PURSUIT OF HISTORY | $12,000 |
| GUATESTAR | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC | $9,000 |
| JDRF INTERNATIONAL | $7,500 |
| KUT RADIO | $5,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC | $5,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES | $5,000 |
| VISTA CENTER FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN BUSINESS HISTORY CENTER | $5,000 |
| MULTI-ASSISTANCE CENTER AT MORGAN'S WONDERLAND | $5,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $5,000 |
| OUR PLACE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago3× · 2022–2024 · $115k · revenue +22%- MFMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +23%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC6× · 2019–2024 · $32k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- NSNASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +67%
- OPOUR PLACEone grant, 2021 · $2k
- OPOUR PLACE NASHVILLEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +183%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)
Habitat seeks to eliminate poverty housing from the world and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Pact institute works to achieve strategic objectives that improve the lives of people around the world who are poor and marginalized through innovation, the exploration of new approaches and partnerships, and funding diversification. it is…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of wake county brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Turning Tables. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
- Who funds MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds GUATESTAR ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds LINC INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA LEGAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MULTI-ASSISTANCE CENTER AT MORGAN'S WONDERLAND ↗
- Who funds THE PURSUIT OF HISTORY INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health NFP ↗
- Who funds ACLU Foundation of Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY'S KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Volunteer Healthcare Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes ↗
- Who funds PARABLE MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of NC Inc ↗
- Who funds Turning Tables ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · St David's Foundation · United Way Worldwide · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The James & Edith Spain Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.