Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James & Barbara Cimino Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.2MEnvironment$963kYouth Development$200kArts & Culture$165kHuman Services$145kRecreation & Sports$97kAnimals$68kHealth$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO BASE CAMP$220,000
WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST$200,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB PUERTO RICO$200,000
FAR WISE$75,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$55,000
AMERICAN PRAIRIE RESERVE$45,000
SENIOR CONNECTION$45,000
SUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FUND$30,000
SCHOLARSHIP PAYMENTS TO VARIOUS UNI$30,000
ENTERPRISE EVENTS GUAYACAN ENDOWMEN$30,000
THE SPACE$25,000
KETCHUM COMMUNITY LIBRARY$25,000
IDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION$25,000
PARA LA NATURALEZA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SENIOR CONNECTION: $45k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $40k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $40k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $10k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
NY
UT
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 30 repeat orgs$587k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$2.4M
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+175%

Still filing today

40%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    IDAHO BASE CAMP INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $240k · revenue +4%
  • FI
    FARWISE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +86%
  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CA
    CARLOS ALBIZU UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $260k · revenue -5%
  • CO
    CITY OF KETCHUM PARKS REC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SD
    SER DE PUERTO RICO
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
4
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
5
Project Big Wood a Nonprofit Corporation

Project big wood is organized to improve the environmental health and ecology of the big wood river basin in central idaho by protecting, enhancing, sustaining and reconnecting the big wood river, its tributaries and its watershed.

Environment
6
Idaho Wildlife Federation

The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.

Animals
7
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
8
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
9
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
10
Wild Earth Society Incorporated

Wildlands Network works to reconnect, restore and rewild North America so that life-in all its diversity-can thrive.

Arts & Culture
11
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
12
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Forever; the most unlike its peers is Para La Naturaleza Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KETCHUM COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $325,000 · OtherKETCHUM COMMUNITY LIBRARYSCHOLARSHIP PAYMENTS TO VARIOUS UNI: $267,916 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP PAYMENTS TO VARIOUS UNIBOYS GIRLS CLUB PUERTO RICO: $200,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB PUERTO RICOIDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION: $160,000 · OtherIDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISIONIndividual grant recipient: $86,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FUND: $77,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $61,000 · Other+26 more: $366,140 · Other+26 moreWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $400,000 · EnvironmentWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COIDAHO BASE CAMP INC: $240,000 · EnvironmentIDAHO BASE CAMP INCAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $96,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATIONPARA LA NATURALEZA INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentPARA LA NATURALEZA INC+2 more: $7,000 · EnvironmentCARLOS ALBIZU UNIVERSITY INC: $260,000 · EducationCARLOS ALBIZU UNIV…FARWISE INC: $150,000 · EducationFARWISE INCThe Space Idaho Inc: $77,000 · EducationThe Space Idaho In…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $145,000 · Human ServicesIdaho Humane Society Inc: $19,000 · AnimalsLIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $14,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $11,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthKINESIS INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 · Religion
Other$1,544,006Environment$793,000Education$489,000Human Services$145,000Animals$49,000Health$30,000Youth Development$5,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $400,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCARLOS ALBIZU UNIVERSITY INC: $260,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIDAHO BASE CAMP INC: $240,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetFARWISE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $145,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $96,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Space Idaho Inc: $77,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $61,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARA LA NATURALEZA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $14,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO RIVERS UNITED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds CARLOS ALBIZU UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO BASE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds FARWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Space Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PARA LA NATURALEZA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Greater Horizons · Boswell Family Foundation · Sahm Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James & Barbara Cimino Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James & Barbara Cimino Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James & Barbara Cimino Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The James & Barbara Cimino Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James & Barbara Cimino’s filings →

More from the funding graph