Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jackson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$873kHuman Services$385kHealth$217kRecreation & Sports$106kCrime & Legal$60kAnimals$53kYouth Development$15kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
$15,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS$123,000
SOUTHERN COLORADO SCIENCE CENTER$50,000
FRIENDLY HARBOR COMMUNITY CENTER$45,000
MT CARMEL VETERANS CENTER$35,000
PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER$30,000
PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$25,000
PUEBLO HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT SOCIETY$23,000
PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$20,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO$15,850
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PUEBLO$15,000
PUEBLO STRONG TAEKWONDO FOUNDATION$10,000
CREATIVE CONSORTIUM OF PUEBLO$10,000
MARIPOSA CENTER FOR SAFETY$5,000
POSADA$3,000
PUEBLO HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $235k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUEBLO YMCA: $30k → 15%MARIPOSA CENTER FOR SAFETY: $75k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $30k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $10k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $10k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $5k → 15%MARIPOSA CENTER FOR SAFETY: $5k → 15%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $4k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $25k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $16k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 22 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$1.6M
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

41%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalAnimalsEnvironmentHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • PC
    PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +61%
  • PC
    Pueblo Cooperative Care Center
    4× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUEBLO COLORADO
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • NS
    NAMI SOUTHEAST COLORADO
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • WA
    WEISBROD AIRCRAFT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Pueblo Inc

Casa of pueblos mission is to advocate for abused and neglected children by providing a voice in the courts and in the community through trained volunteers.

Crime & Legal
2
Pueblo Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

To empower women and families in the greater pueblo colorado area with the educational, emotional and spiritual resources they need to choose life and thrive.

Health
3
Nature and Raptor Center of Pueblo

The agency is a conservation Center near Pueblo, CO, where land and people can provide unique experiences in education, conservation and recreation that inspire responsible environmental stewardship.

—
4
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
5
Pueblo Primary Care Qalicb

To support pueblo community health center.

Health
6
Pueblo Critico Inc
Education
7
Pueblo Community Health Center Foundation Inc

Fundraising and financial assistance to pueblo community health center

Health
8
Pueblo Symphony Association Inc

To bring musical artists together to perform concerts for the citizens of the city and county of pueblo.

Arts & Culture
9
Pueblo Unido Cdc

To address the needs and problems of distressed rural communities through a strategic plan to utilize existing resources and create new opportunities with the collaboration of community members to achieve social change.

Housing & Shelter
10
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

—
11
Pueblo Hispanic Education Foundation

Provides scholarships for higher education.

Education
12
Pueblo Library Foundation

The organization is organized to perform functions of or to carryout the purposes of the Pueblo City-County Library District including providing resources for development maintenance and operation of the Pueblo City-County Library District…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Pueblo Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Cancer Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS: $697,896 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTSMT CARMEL VETERANS CENTER: $90,000 · OtherMT CARMEL VETERANS CENTERPUEBLO FAMILY YMCA: $86,000 · OtherPUEBLO FAMILY YMCAFRIENDLY HARBOR DROP IN: $78,675 · OtherFRIENDLY HARBOR DROP INFRIENDLY HARBOR DROP IN CENTER: $73,000 · OtherSOUTHERN COLORADO SCIENCE CENTER: $60,000 · Other+23 more: $288,514 · Other+23 moreMariposa Center for Safety: $80,000 · Human ServicesMariposa Center…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $74,850 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAG…Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $50,000 · Human ServicesPueblo Cooperat…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUEBLO COLORADO: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHR…PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $60,000 · Crime & LegalPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDAT: $7,500 · PhilanthropyNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $4,000 · EnvironmentPOSADA: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · Health
Other$1,374,085Human Services$234,850Crime & Legal$60,000Animals$50,000Philanthropy$7,500Environment$4,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMariposa Center for Safety: $80,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC: $74,850 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetPUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $60,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetPueblo Cooperative Care Center: $50,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPUEBLO HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT SOCIETY: $33,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUEBLO COLORADO: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPUEBLO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDAT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOSADA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN COLORADO HERITAGE CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mariposa Center for Safety ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Cooperative Care Center ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUEBLO COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDAT ↗
  • Who funds NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POSADA ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO POVERTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert Hoag Rawlings FoundationCO24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation · Southern Colorado Community Foundat · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Denver Foundation · United Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ryals Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jackson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jackson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jackson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jackson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jackson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph