· Private foundation
Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of PUEBLO DAY NURSERY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PUEBLO | $5,000 |
| PUEBLO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIN | $5,000 |
| EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO | $5,000 |
| CASA OF PUEBLO | $4,387 |
| A CARING PREGNANCY CENTER | $3,000 |
| SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS AND CONFERENC | $3,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PUEBLO | $3,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $2,700 |
| CARE & SHARE | $2,500 |
| EARLY LEARNING VENTURES | $2,500 |
| POSADA | $2,500 |
| PUEBLO HERITAGE MUSEUM | $1,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPOSADA6× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +67%
- COCASA OF PUEBLO INC7× · 2018–2024 · $21k · revenue +120%
- PZPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- NANATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTERone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +12%
- EPEXECUTIVE PARTNERING TO CHILDRENone grant, 2022 · $4k
- SESOARING EAGLES CENTER FOR AUTISMone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower women and families in the greater pueblo colorado area with the educational, emotional and spiritual resources they need to choose life and thrive.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
To support pueblo community health center.
To create pathways of opportunity where people with diverse abilities thrive through informed choices, meaningful education and employment, premier residential services, and dynamic social experience.
The organization is organized to perform functions of or to carryout the purposes of the Pueblo City-County Library District including providing resources for development maintenance and operation of the Pueblo City-County Library District…
El pueblo mission is to build collective power through leadership development organizing and direct act so that the latin american community and other marginalized communities control our own stories and destinies
Nurturing child development in partnership with families of diverse backgrounds.
Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.
Our mission is to attract, retain, and expand primary jobs for the Pueblo community.
Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Side Child Care Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Early Learning Ventures. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POSADA ↗
- Who funds CASA OF PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING VENTURES ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PUEBLO ↗
- Who funds Pueblo Cooperative Care Center ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOARING EAGLES CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds Mariposa Center for Safety ↗
- Who funds Executives Partnering to Invest in Children (EPIC) ↗
- Who funds HARP FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Southern Colorado Community Foundat · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · El Pomar Foundation · Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · United Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Ryals Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pueblo Day Nursery Children's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.