Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2019
6
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $20k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
17
3
18
6
19
0
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$282kCommunity Improvement$188kEducation$16kHealth$10kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$23k
02FY2019 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL$10,000
NEW CANAAN YMCA$5,000
ELM PROJECT$2,000
NEW ENGLAND DANCE THEATRE INC$1,000
SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH$1,000
NEW CANAAN MOUNTED TROOP$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 4 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$35k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-7%

Still filing today

75%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH
    2× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +57%
  • TN
    THE NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NEW CANAAN MOUNTED TROOP INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GC
    GOOD COUNSEL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • SO
    SISTERS OF LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SA
    ST ALOYSIUS CHURCH CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
4
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

5
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
New West Charter School

The mission of new west charter school is to provide an academically rigorous, highly individualized education for 21st century students in grades 6 - 12. in the decades to come, personal success will require increasingly high levels of…

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Canaan Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Good Counsel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $188,376 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $94,100 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $188,200 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUN…THE NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $13,000 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFE — $4,500 · OtherST ALOYSIUS CHURCH CORP — $2,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT — $2,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $1,100 · OtherTHE ELM PROJECT — $2,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND DANCE THEATER INC — $1,000 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH — $16,000 · EducationThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $10,000 · HealthGOOD COUNSEL INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesNEW CANAAN MOUNTED TROOP INC — $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$282,476Community Improvement$188,200Other$26,100Education$16,000Health$10,000Human Services$4,500Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $188,376 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $188,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $94,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD COUNSEL INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CANAAN MOUNTED TROOP INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND DANCE THEATER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN14.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • New England Dance Theater Inc5% of income from government
  • New Canaan Mounted Troop Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The J Michael III and Geraldine a Joyce Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph