· Private foundation
The Inukai Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNTAIN HEALTH | $10,000 |
| JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF OREGON | $5,000 |
| JAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF OREGON | $5,000 |
| THE CLOSET | $3,000 |
| CARE & SHARE COMMUNITY OUTREACH | $3,000 |
| OPEN SCHOOL INC | $2,500 |
| THE CHILDREN'S READING FOUNDATION OF THE MID COLUMBIA | $1,500 |
| METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE | $1,500 |
| ODYSSEY WORLD INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SERVICES | $1,500 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MATTHEW CONFERENCE | $1,500 |
| AFTER INC | $1,500 |
| MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP | $1,500 |
| REXBURG SOUP KITCHEN | $1,000 |
| HOOD RIVER VALLEY ADULT CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JAPAN AMERICA SOCIETY OF OREGON6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +58%- FOFRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC2× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +716%
- HSHollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging3× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +157%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $19k
- FIFRENCH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF OREGONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +36%
- TCTHE CHILDRENS COURSE INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
Kairospdx's singularly focused mission is to close the racial achievement and opportunity gaps by cultivating confident, creative, compassionate leaders exceeding academic standards at each developmental milestone from ages 0-10.
The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…
We believe that the strength of our community lies in its diversity. we know the power of many different voices at the table. these voices resound from the hearts and minds of our youth, who hold the keys to a just, fair and sustainable…
Friends of the children - central oregon is a oregon based nonprofit with the mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years,…
Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…
To protect children, support families, and bring hope and healing through compassionate, coordinated, and child-centered advocacy, through specialized programs and services, such as multi-disciplinary team coordination, forensic…
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Circle of Friends School is a female-founded 501c3 in Lane County Oregon serving children and youth with complex disabilities and those who love them. We are building a community that is founded on opportunities. Every person has value.
Daycare for children ages 2 1/2 to 9, including a four year old Kindergarten program.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ridgefield Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JAPAN AMERICA SOCIETY OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds FRENCH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS COURSE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR RIVERS CULTURAL CENTER AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging ↗
- Who funds MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP ↗
- Who funds Northwest Kidney Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds HOOD RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds CARE AND SHARE COMMANITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE OREGON ↗
- Who funds THE CLOSET INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds OPEN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HOOD RIVER NEW SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds 3 RS Equine Therapy Center ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SALVAGE BUREAU ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AFTER INC ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Service ↗
- Who funds THE READING FOUNDATION CRF OF THE ↗
- Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY WORLD INTERNATIONALEDUCATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FB4K Portland Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Hoover Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Inukai Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Oregon Child Abuse Solutions — 30% of income from government
- Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
- Elevate Oregon — 28% of income from government
- Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp — 18% of income from government
- Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — 9% of income from government
- Japanese American Museum of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- Open School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Inukai Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Inukai Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.