· Private foundation
The Hylbert Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILITARY MISSIONS INC | $50,000 |
| CORNER TO CORNER | $50,000 |
| COASTAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC | $25,000 |
| LADY VETERANS CONNECT INC | $20,000 |
| THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CO | $10,000 |
| SADDLES IN SERVICES | $10,000 |
| SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC | $10,000 |
| PROMISE INC | $10,000 |
| SADDLES IN SERVICES | $10,000 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF NASSAU FOUND INC | $10,000 |
| HOPE INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| B Gallegos | $6,500 |
| CUREBOUND INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCorner To Corner5× · 2020–2024 · $152k · revenue +108%
- MMMILITARY MISSIONS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +5% · 29% of their budget
- CCCOASTAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SDSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
- BTBACKING THE LINE INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
- PRPromise Ranch Therapeutic Ridinggraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +148%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.
The university of san diego is a contemporary catholic university, grounded in the liberal arts and anchored along an international border, advancing academic excellence to create a more inclusive, sustainable and hopeful world.
Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
See Disclosure Above.
To deliver accessible world-class student experiences by providing quality programs and services that ensure student success through meaningful learning. to be an inclusive and innovative university serving life-long learners who…
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.
Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is District Attorney Investigators Assoc of Sd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Corner To Corner ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIPS AT AUSCHWITZ FOR THE STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS INC ↗
- Who funds MILITARY MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LADY VETERANS CONNECT ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SADDLES IN SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds KODIAK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SONG INC ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds Promise Ranch Therapeutic Riding ↗
- Who funds Roman Catholic Archdiocese Of Nassau FOUNDATION INC (RCAN FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS ASSOC OF SD ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hylbert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Promise Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.