Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Huelsmann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$577k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$741kArts & Culture$350kReligion$275kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $221k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE FLOWER CATHOLIC SCHOOLGRANT #1$275,000
SEELEY TRAILS FOUNDATION$70,930
CHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION$50,000
CENTRAL CROSS COUNTRY SKIING$50,000
AMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION GRANT #1$50,000
STILLWATER LIBRARY FOUNDATION$35,000
BISHOP MANOGUE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$31,323
COMMUNITY THREAD$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%COMMUNITY THREAD: $15k → 6%FAMILY MEANS: $10k → 6%COMMUNITY THREAD: $10k → 6%COMMUNITY THREAD: $10k → 6%COMMUNITY THREAD: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Huelsmann Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 33% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 20%.

The Huelsmann Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 13 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+40%

Still filing today

38%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LITTLE FLOWER CATHOLIC SCHOOLGRANT #1
    4× · 2021–2025 · $665k
  • BM
    BISHOP MANOGUE CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $314k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $250k

Funded once

  • WC
    Washington County Historical Societygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +148%
  • TL
    THE LOPPET FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • SP
    STILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY FDTN
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Snoqualmie Valley Trail and River
Environment
2
Complete the Loop Coalition

The complete the loop coalition is a local, volunteer corporation which has successfully advocated funding and development of public trails in the wenatchee valley in central washington state since 1990.

—
3
Stillwater Chamber of Commerce

The Stillwater Chamber is the leader in representing business and the driving force behind the economic development of Stillwater. The Chamber builds business through educational programs and establishes connections while representing…

—
4
Duluth Cross Country Ski Club

Promote health through skiing

Recreation & Sports
5
Sheridan Community Land Trust

Sheridan community land trust preserves our open spaces, healthy rivers and creeks, working ranches, wildlife habitat, and vibrant history, while expanding recreation opportunities to connect people with the places they love.

Environment
6
Active Central Mn

To promote wellbeing through community-wide support of healthy, active lives. we envision a year-round series of fitness experiences: active people enjoying minnesota's great outdoors, leading healthy lives, and contributing to a vibrant…

Recreation & Sports
7
Cloquet Nordic Ski Club
Recreation & Sports
8
Swedetown Trails Club

Swedetown Trails Club (STC) is dedicated to providing the best trail experiences possible at the Swedetown Recreation Area in Calumet, Michigan. Club members work to connect people to trails, nature, and each other through outdoor…

—
9
Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association Inc

To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.

Environment
10
Lake Champlain Committee Inc

Lcc is dedicated to protecting lake champlain's environmental integrity and recreational resources for this and future generations through science- based advocacy, education, and collaborative action.

Environment
11
Wenatchee Valley Museum & Cultural Center

To gather, engage, and educate people to celebrate and preserve the history, arts, sciences, and rich diversity of our region.

Arts & Culture
12
Steele County Historical Society

Our mission is to preserve artifacts and interpret the history of the land, peoples and events of Steele County, relating them to the history of the state and nation, and making these records and materials available to all who wish to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Cross Country Skiing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas E & Edna D Carpenter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE FLOWER CATHOLIC SCHOOLGRANT #1: $665,000 · OtherLITTLE FLOWER CATHOLIC SCHOOLGRANT #1BISHOP MANOGUE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $314,342 · OtherBISHOP MANOGUE CATHOLIC SCHOOLST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCHAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION GRANT #2: $200,000 · OtherAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION GRANT #2AMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION GRANT #1: $130,000 · OtherAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION GRANT #1SEELEY TRAILS FOUNDATION: $70,930 · Other+13 more: $320,400 · Other+13 moreCENTRAL CROSS COUNTRY SKIING INC: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL CROSS …CHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATI: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsCHEQUAMEGON AR…THE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LOPPET FOU…AMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSTILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationSTILLWATER…THE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $54,000 · EducationTHE PARTNE…COMMUNITY THREAD: $45,000 · Human ServicesFAMILYMEANS: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,950,672Recreation & Sports$315,000Education$229,000Human Services$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL CROSS COUNTRY SKIING INC: $200,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSTILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $54,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetWashington County Historical Society: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY THREAD: $45,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHOMAS E & EDNA D CARPENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILYMEANS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY CHAMBER CHORALE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL CROSS COUNTRY SKIING INC ↗
  • Who funds STILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATI ↗
  • Who funds Washington County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds THE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY THREAD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS E & EDNA D CARPENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILYMEANS ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY CHAMBER CHORALE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · St Croix Valley Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · The Raleigh Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Huelsmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Huelsmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huelsmann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph