Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hous Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$28kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$13kYouth Development$10kHealth$7kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k48 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$949k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHINING DIAMONDS DANCE STUDIO$12,500
Individual grant recipient$4,950
Individual grant recipient$4,220
THE CHEER INSTITUTE$3,200
COMMUNITY FOR NEW DIRECTION$1,900
COLUMBUS DIAMONDS ELITE CHEER$1,300
MICHELLE TUESDAY MUSIC SCHOOL$1,265
YOUNG CHEFS ACADEMY$1,112
YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO HILLTOP$1,000
ORIENTAL MARTIAL ARTS COLLEGE$1,000
PASSE DANCE CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
I9 SPORTS$976
DICKS SPORTING GOODS$965
Individual grant recipient$875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLINTONVILLE BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY FOR NEW DIRECTION: $2k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $5k → 15%MY VERY OWN BLANKET: $5k → 15%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5k → 15%COPLAY: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
2
Central Ohio Athletic Association

Athletic/civic opportunities for Youth

Youth Development
3
Christ Child Society of Toledo

Service to needy children.

—
4
Columbus Community Childrens Cente

Provide day care services for up to 20 children, ages newborn to 5.

—
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of Columbus Inc

To enable young people to reach their full potential

Youth Development
6
Clothe-a-Child of Ohio Inc

To provide clothing to underprivileged children located in Northwest Ohio.

Human Services
7
Columbus Diaper Bank

The Columbus Diaper Bank is a 501 (c)(3) organization incorporated in Columbus, Ohio. The Columbus Diaper Bank works to improve the lives of Central Ohio families by providing diapers to the families in need and to increase community…

Public Benefit
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Northeast Ohio Education Coalition

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Kids Under the Radar
Human Services
10
Cleveland Kids' Book Bank

Our mission is to foster improved literacy and a love of reading by providing free books to children through collaboration with community partners.

Education
11
Optimist International-Centerville Ohio Noon

Service to youth and youth related organizations

—
12
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clintonville-Beechwold Community Resources Center; the most unlike its peers is Coplay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHINING DIAMONDS DANCE STUDIO: $12,500 · OtherSHINING DIAMONDS DANCE STUDIOIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARM: $5,000 · OtherWARMThe Mirth Project: $5,000 · OtherThe Mirth ProjectIndividual grant recipient: $4,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,220 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHEER INSTITUTE: $3,200 · Other+42 more: $23,765 · Other+42 moreGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSECLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD C…OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATIO…MY VERY OWN BLANKET PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMY VERY OWN BLANKET PROJ…COMMUNITY FOR NEW DIRECTION INC: $1,900 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOR NEW DIRECT…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesLITTLE BOTTOMS FREE STORE: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKIDS GET CANCER TOO: $5,000 · HealthALL THAT- TEENS HOPEFUL ABOUT TOMMORROW: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLUMBUS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $830 · Arts & CultureGahanna Junior League Sports Inc: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$63,635Human Services$22,000Philanthropy$5,000Health$5,000Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$830Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE BOTTOMS FREE STORE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mirth Project: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetKIDS GET CANCER TOO: $5,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMY VERY OWN BLANKET PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALL THAT- TEENS HOPEFUL ABOUT TOMMORROW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLUMBUS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $830 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPLAY: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BOTTOMS FREE STORE ↗
  • Who funds CLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Mirth Project ↗
  • Who funds KIDS GET CANCER TOO ↗
  • Who funds OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MY VERY OWN BLANKET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL THAT- TEENS HOPEFUL ABOUT TOMMORROW ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOR NEW DIRECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Cardinal Health Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hous Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hous Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hous Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hous Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hous’ filings →

    More from the funding graph