Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hough Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$501k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.3MHealth$2.5MEnvironment$595kRecreation & Sports$380kAnimals$205kReligion$180kFood & Nutrition$73kHuman Services$59kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
  • $250k+2 grants · $751k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$501,000
BEAUMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTE$75,000
BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$60,000
APOPO US INC$35,000
NORTHBROOK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
WARRIORS AND QUIET WATERS$25,000
KALAMAZOO COLLEGE$20,000
FOUNDATION ST LOUIS ACADEMY$10,000
SAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE$10,000
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK$10,000
HENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,500
MOTOR CITY LYRIC OPERA$5,000
SOCIETY FOR RE-INSTITUTIONALIZATION$5,000
MARY'S MERCY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%APOPO US INC: $35k → 14%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $5k → 21%FRANKLIN-BINGHAM FARMS POLICE BEN: $1k → 8%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $4k → 21%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $4k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $4k → 8%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $2k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $3k → 8%CITYWIDE MENTORING: $6k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $3k → 8%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $2k → 21%CITYWIDE MENTORING: $4k → 21%REMEMBERING CHERUBS: $1k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
IA
IN
CA
UT
VA
AZ
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 25 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

$4.2M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+53%

Still filing today

60%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue +49%
  • KC
    KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +41%
  • SD
    SAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +291%

Funded once

  • GC
    GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -22%
  • LC
    LORAS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • GW
    GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
2
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
3
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
4
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

—
5
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
6
Mercy College of Health Sciences

We, mercy college of health sciences and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy college of health sciences is a member of trinity health.

Religion
7
Michigan State Medical Society

Promote a health care environment that supports physicians in caring for and enhancing the health of michigan citizens through science, quality, and ethics in the practice of medicine.

—
8
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
Lymphoma Research Foundation

To eradicate lymphoma and serve those touched by this disease.

Health
12
Michigan State University Research Foundation

To provide support for the board of trustees of michigan state university and to promote, sponsor, assist, and carry out educational, scientific, charitable and related activities and objectives of michigan state university.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warfighter Scuba. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,017,100 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $150,000 · Education+2 more: $45,500 · EducationBEAUMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,035,000 · OtherBEAUMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONBIG SKY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $525,000 · OtherBIG SKY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTE: $377,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTENORTHBROOK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $180,000 · OtherNORTHBROOK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+22 more: $255,000 · Other+22 moreBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $370,000 · EnvironmentSAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE: $52,500 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentBLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Animals+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOUNDATION OF DES MOINES IOWA: $36,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 · HealthMITOACTION INC: $27,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthPLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP: $12,500 · HealthCUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthYOGA MOVES MS: $5,000 · HealthAPOPO US INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesRemembering Cherubs: $17,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $11,500 · Human ServicesCITYWIDE MENTORING: $9,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $50,000 · Food & NutritionMary's Mercy Center: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$4,212,600Other$3,372,000Environment$427,500Animals$205,000Health$145,500Human Services$74,000Food & Nutrition$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,017,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $370,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE: $52,500 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE RE-INSITUTIONALIZAT: $40,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetMERCY FOUNDATION OF DES MOINES IOWA: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $35,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMITOACTION INC: $27,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRemembering Cherubs: $17,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetMOTOR CITY LYRIC OPERA: $15,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetPLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP: $12,500 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $11,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Mercy Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF DES MOINES: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGallatin River Task Force: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOGA MOVES MS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetHOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWARFIGHTER SCUBA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN-BINGHAM FARMS POLICE BENEVOLENT FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds BLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE RE-INSITUTIONALIZAT ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION OF DES MOINES IOWA ↗
  • Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MITOACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Remembering Cherubs ↗
  • Who funds MOTOR CITY LYRIC OPERA ↗
  • Who funds PLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Mercy Center ↗
  • Who funds GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION ST LOUIS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF DES MOINES ↗
  • Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Gallatin River Task Force ↗
  • Who funds YOGA MOVES MS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foren Family FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foren Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hough Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hough Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hough Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hough Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hough’s filings →

    More from the funding graph