Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Holley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$431kEducation$395kFood & Nutrition$196kYouth Development$188kArts & Culture$95kHuman Services$63kReligion$40kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $197k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MACC DEVELOPMENT$40,000
READ TO A CHILD$36,000
DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM$30,000
GLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICH$20,000
CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY$20,000
AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MI$20,000
INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS$17,000
DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT$14,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SE MICH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $23k → 21%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Holley Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 71%.

The Holley Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+341%

Still filing today

56%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BEYOND BASICS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $265k · revenue +343%
  • DB
    DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +91%
  • INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • HF
    HANTZ FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +341%
  • HC
    HOPE COMMUNITY OUTREACH & DEVELOPME
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diploma Equity Project

The organization works with k-12, higher education and other community partners to design and implement programs to improve rates of college persistence and completion.

Education
2
About Face Detroit
—
3
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
4
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
5
Progressionista

Progressionista serves Detroit girls ages 8-12 with literacy and mentorship programming and provides annually 250 books in total for participants to keep, in-person masterclasses with women professionals, hands-on career projects, and…

Youth Development
6
Detroit 90 90

The organization provides educational management services to public school academies in the State of Michigan

Education
7
Reading Works

Reading works is dedicated to raising the level of adult literacy in metro detroit and promoting the idea that readng works in the family and in the workplace.

—
8
The Detroit Public Library Friends Foundation Inc

To promote and enhance the city of detroit's cultural growth, all forms of literacy, an interest in books, and other forms of human record and to establish cooperative relationships and programs with the detroit public library and other…

Education
9
Local Circles

Local circles offers young detroiters an employment opportunity in youth- led research. by employing youth to do research, local circles intervenes on two simultaneous social issues facing young detroiters today: youth unemployment and…

—
10
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Progress Michigan Education Inc

Progress Michigan Education is a non-partisan, nonprofit 501(c)3 organization that promotes solutions for michigan through independent research, public education and the use of new media and internet outreach campaigns.

Public Benefit
12
Detroit Regional Chamber Foundation Inc

Detroit regional chamber foundation, inc. (the "foundation") is dedicated to growing programs or initiatives that are important to ensuring the detroit region's economy is one of the fastest growing in the u.s.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Public Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hantz Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICH: $194,650 · OtherGLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICHTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT: $52,200 · OtherTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECTCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $40,000 · OtherCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNIT…SALVATION ARMY: $28,282 · OtherSALVATION ARMYINSIDEOUT LIT ART PROJ CARSTENS SC: $26,000 · OtherINSIDEOUT LIT ART PROJ CARSTENS SCMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCIL: $20,000 · OtherAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MI: $20,000 · OtherGREAT LAKES FIELD SERVICE COUNCIL: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $55,945 · Other+7 moreMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP: $431,000 · Community ImprovementMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COM…BEYOND BASICS: $265,000 · EducationBEYOND BASICSLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $62,500 · EducationLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVER…READ TO A CHILD INC: $36,000 · EducationREAD TO A CHILD INCDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $25,925 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDA…DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $85,000 · Recreation & SportsHANTZ FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsINSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT: $69,000 · Arts & CultureDetroit Parent Network: $35,000 · Human Services
Other$457,077Community Improvement$431,000Education$389,425Recreation & Sports$100,000Arts & Culture$69,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP: $431,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $265,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $85,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT: $69,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $62,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT: $52,200 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC: $36,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDetroit Parent Network: $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $25,925 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds READ TO A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Parent Network ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANTZ FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Holley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Holley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Holley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Holley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph