Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Holley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$431kEducation$395kFood & Nutrition$196kYouth Development$188kArts & Culture$95kHuman Services$63kReligion$40kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $197k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MACC DEVELOPMENT$40,000
READ TO A CHILD$36,000
DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM$30,000
CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY$20,000
AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MI$20,000
GLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICH$20,000
INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS$17,000
DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT$14,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SE MICH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $23k → 21%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Holley Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Holley Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+341%

Still filing today

56%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BEYOND BASICS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $265k · revenue +343%
  • DB
    DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +91%
  • INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • HF
    HANTZ FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +341%
  • HC
    HOPE COMMUNITY OUTREACH & DEVELOPME
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diploma Equity Project

The organization works with k-12, higher education and other community partners to design and implement programs to improve rates of college persistence and completion.

Education
2
About Face Detroit
3
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
4
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
5
Progressionista

Progressionista serves Detroit girls ages 8-12 with literacy and mentorship programming and provides annually 250 books in total for participants to keep, in-person masterclasses with women professionals, hands-on career projects, and…

Youth Development
6
Detroit 90 90

The organization provides educational management services to public school academies in the State of Michigan

Education
7
Reading Works

Reading works is dedicated to raising the level of adult literacy in metro detroit and promoting the idea that readng works in the family and in the workplace.

8
The Detroit Public Library Friends Foundation Inc

To promote and enhance the city of detroit's cultural growth, all forms of literacy, an interest in books, and other forms of human record and to establish cooperative relationships and programs with the detroit public library and other…

Education
9
Local Circles

Local circles offers young detroiters an employment opportunity in youth- led research. by employing youth to do research, local circles intervenes on two simultaneous social issues facing young detroiters today: youth unemployment and…

10
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Progress Michigan Education Inc

Progress Michigan Education is a non-partisan, nonprofit 501(c)3 organization that promotes solutions for michigan through independent research, public education and the use of new media and internet outreach campaigns.

Public Benefit
12
Detroit Regional Chamber Foundation Inc

Detroit regional chamber foundation, inc. (the "foundation") is dedicated to growing programs or initiatives that are important to ensuring the detroit region's economy is one of the fastest growing in the u.s.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hantz Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICH — $194,650 · OtherGLEANERS COMM FOOD BANK OF SE MICHTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT — $52,200 · OtherTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECTCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 · OtherCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNIT…SALVATION ARMY — $28,282 · OtherSALVATION ARMYINSIDEOUT LIT ART PROJ CARSTENS SC — $26,000 · OtherINSIDEOUT LIT ART PROJ CARSTENS SCMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCIL — $20,000 · OtherAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MI — $20,000 · OtherGREAT LAKES FIELD SERVICE COUNCIL — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $55,945 · Other+7 moreMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP — $431,000 · Community ImprovementMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COM…BEYOND BASICS — $265,000 · EducationBEYOND BASICSLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY — $62,500 · EducationLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVER…READ TO A CHILD INC — $36,000 · EducationREAD TO A CHILD INCDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $25,925 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDA…DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $85,000 · Recreation & SportsHANTZ FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsINSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT — $69,000 · Arts & CultureDetroit Parent Network — $35,000 · Human Services
Other$457,077Community Improvement$431,000Education$389,425Recreation & Sports$100,000Arts & Culture$69,000Human Services$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP — $431,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetBEYOND BASICS — $265,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $85,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT — $69,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY — $62,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT — $52,200 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC — $36,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDetroit Parent Network — $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $25,925 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM
  • Who funds INSIDEOUT LITERARY ARTS PROJECT
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE DETROIT CREATIVITY PROJECT
  • Who funds CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds READ TO A CHILD INC
  • Who funds Detroit Parent Network
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HANTZ FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Holley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Holley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Holley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph