Skip to content
The Holland Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Holland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$99MEducation$46MHealth$9.1MYouth Development$8.0MCrime & Legal$6.9MPhilanthropy$6.8MHuman Services$6.6MRecreation & Sports$5.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+11 grants · $37M
$90,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERA OMAHA$30,359,157
UNIVERSITY OF NE FOUNDATION$1,933,058
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY$1,314,862
PARTNERSHIP 4 KIDS INC$715,000
PROJECT HARMONY$500,000
OMAHA SYMPHONY$450,000
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$415,000
AMERICAN MIDWEST BALLET$350,000
NEBRASKA APPLESEED$325,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$250,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
KANEKO$155,000
ONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$150,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND$150,000
NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KNIGHTS OF AKSARBEN FOUNDATION: $389k → 12%LENA POPE HOME INC: $31k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%CRCC: $203k → 12%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $200k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $65k → 12%CRCC: $200k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $125k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%CRCC: $100k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $100k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $100k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $50k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE NEBRASKA: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $1.1M → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $270k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $220k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $210k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $100k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $100k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $100k → 12%TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $60k → 12%TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $50k → 12%TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $50k → 12%ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $500k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $150k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $124k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $100k → 12%ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $100k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $50k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $50k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $1.3M → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $1.2M → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $1.2M → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $1.0M → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $500k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IA
CO
NE
VA
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199M · 109 repeat orgs$9.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

109 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
42

Total granted

$199M
$9.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+11%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +70%
  • OP
    OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17M · revenue +120%
  • P4
    Partnership 4 Kids Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +49% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • HS
    HERITAGE SERVICES COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST
    one grant, 2017 · $4.9M
  • FF
    FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • AO
    All Our Kids Inc Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $864k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
3
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
4
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
5
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
6
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
7
Voices for Children in Nebraska

Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.

—
8
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
9
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
10
Nebraska Votes

The organization's purpose is to ensure a fair and modern democracy in nebraska through research, education, and advocacy for policies and practices that promote participation in democracy.

Civil Rights
11
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
12
Nebraska State Education Association

The mission of the nebraska state education association is to advocate for all education professionals, emplowering them to provide an excellent public education for every student.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civic Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Kim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/115
Grantees still filing
74/115
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERA OMAHA INC: $45,034,241 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAHA INCOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $16,977,963 · Arts & CultureOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETYJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $3,781,473 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $8,527,598 · Arts & Culture+16 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $24,376,223 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA…COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $5,146,066 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARYMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,333,077 · EducationMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY…OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST: $2,455,558 · EducationOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUSTTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,680,652 · Education+12 more: $4,387,004 · Education+12 moreOMAHA SYMPHONY: $13,043,922 · OtherOMAHA SYMPHONYHERITAGE SERVICES COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $4,899,363 · OtherHERITAGE SERVICES COMMUNITY INF…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,966,704 · OtherNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $2,427,957 · OtherPROJECT HARMONY: $2,313,688 · OtherTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $4,080,773 · OtherTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMA…OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $3,957,260 · OtherOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION+82 more: $24,971,348 · Other+82 morePartnership 4 Kids Inc: $6,029,835 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $4,535,362 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $1,530,155 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $1,255,113 · Youth Development+1 more: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $5,269,804 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,293,202 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $828,056 · Human ServicesEconomic Empowerment Center: $600,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $474,486 · Human ServicesKNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $389,344 · Human Services+6 more: $1,106,259 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $5,618,780 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $402,016 · Health+6 more: $776,858 · HealthDOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST: $4,640,366 · Community ImprovementYATES FUND: $898,481 · Community Improvement+2 more: $215,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$74,321,275Education$41,378,580Other$57,661,015Youth Development$13,420,465Human Services$10,961,151Health$6,797,654Community Improvement$5,753,847

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERA OMAHA INC: $45,034,241 over 9y, 64% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $24,376,223 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $16,977,963 over 9y, 19% of budgetPartnership 4 Kids Inc: $6,029,835 over 9y, 45% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $5,618,780 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $5,269,804 over 6y, 12% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $5,146,066 over 6y, 12% of budgetDOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST: $4,640,366 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $4,535,362 over 9y, 23% of budgetTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $4,080,773 over 7y, 71% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $3,957,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $3,781,473 over 8y, 37% of budgetMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,333,077 over 5y, 59% of budgetOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST: $2,455,558 over 3y, 14% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $2,427,957 over 9y, 11% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $2,313,688 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,966,704 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,680,652 over 6y, 13% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $1,657,988 over 8y, 35% of budgetNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $1,548,976 over 6y, 19% of budgetBALLET NEBRASKA: $1,541,754 over 8y, 13% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $1,530,155 over 9y, 12% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,494,879 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $1,427,656 over 6y, 16% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $1,308,819 over 9y, 72% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,293,202 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $1,255,113 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $1,208,179 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,005,113 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBlue Barn Theatre: $1,004,100 over 9y, 67% of budgetNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE: $1,000,532 over 5y, 21% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $1,000,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetOMAHA THEATER COMPANY: $990,394 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetOMAHA SHELTER FOR HOMELESS TRUST: $966,454 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetYATES FUND: $898,481 over 3y, 55% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $829,018 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $828,056 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetBEMIS CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $735,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $692,500 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $650,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCARE OF OMAHA INC: $650,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKANEKO: $636,918 over 8y, 12% of budgetCIVIC NEBRASKA: $620,113 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetEconomic Empowerment Center: $600,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: $550,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $547,502 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $500,009 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $474,486 over 5y, 8.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Partnership 4 Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds BALLET NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Blue Barn Theatre ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA SHELTER FOR HOMELESS TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood Foundati…The Lozier FoundationWeitz Family Foundati…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Peter Kiewit Foundati…The Hawks FoundationThe Charles and Mary …Annette and Paul Smit…Jewish Federation of …Nebraska Community Fo…Suzanne & Walter Scot…Mutual of Omaha Found…
The Sherwood FoundationNE154.4× affinity81 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Holland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Holland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Holland Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Holland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Holland’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home