Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Nebraska · Nonprofit

OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST

OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST (Nebraska) receives grants from 44 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,521,669 to it, the largest being Peter Kiewit Foundation ($21,151,000). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$6.1M
Revenue FY2025
44
Funders on record
$66M
Grants received
$86M
Net assets
22/44 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST is better cushioned than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−63% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−38% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($65M) Expenses 100 ($3.3M) Net assets 100 ($61M)2021 Revenue 55 ($36M) Expenses 56 ($1.8M) Net assets 155 ($95M)2022 Revenue 7 ($4.8M) Expenses 107 ($3.5M) Net assets 157 ($96M)2023 Revenue 14 ($8.7M) Expenses 380 ($12M) Net assets 151 ($93M)2024 Revenue 15 ($9.5M) Expenses 404 ($13M) Net assets 145 ($89M)2025 Revenue 9 ($6.1M) Expenses 305 ($10.0M) Net assets 141 ($86M)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (9)Expenses (305)Net assets (141)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

48% of OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$61M
20
$34M
21
$1.3M
22
$3.7M
23
$3.7M
24
$3.8M
25
4.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 24 funders, grant income rose $11M → $14M.

9 of 44 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 44 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 32% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

32%
largest funder
63%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 90% · 2021 40% · 2022 36% · 2023 40%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

96% of OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.

IA
IN
NE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
22
23
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 44 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 11%Fundraising 13%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

65%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST?
OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST (Nebraska) receives grants from 44 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,521,669 to it, the largest being Peter Kiewit Foundation ($21,151,000). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST have?
IRS filings report 44 organizations giving $65,521,669 in grants to OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST?
Peter Kiewit Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $21,151,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 44funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing