Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of the jewish federation of omaha.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$9.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Omaha Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 66 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

30
’17
46
’18
58
’19
58
’20
58
’21
55
’22
59
’23
69
’24
66
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$44MReligion$7.4MEducation$6.6MArts & Culture$1.6MInternational$1.2MHealth$923kAnimals$663kCivil Rights$484kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 72 grants below total $13,932,931 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,407,231 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $474,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $144k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $642k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $799k
  • $250k+7 grants · $12M
$12,660
Median grant
15
States reached
$145M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA$9,498,442
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NEBRASKA$811,826
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$482,700
FRIEDEL JEWISH ACADEMY$440,343
BETH EL SYNAGOGUE$421,433
BELLEVUE UNIVERSITY$401,500
NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY$291,200
TEMPLE ISRAEL$194,684
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$144,000
FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION$100,500
STREET KIDS INTERNATIONAL$100,000
BETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE$83,320
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$70,800
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$55,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEMA AN ACHAI$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 12%SHARE INC: $13k → 14%SHARE INC: $8k → 14%SHARE INC: $5k → 14%HIDDEN WATER INC: $5k → 17%HIDDEN WATER INC: $5k → 17%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $10k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $7k → 12%GRIEFS JOURNEY: $13k → 12%COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $10k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 93 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

93 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

93
55

Total granted

$19M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

80%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $603k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +70%
  • NH
    NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $554k · revenue +16%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $338k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAKOR CHAIM USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +36% · 37% of their budget
  • AY
    AM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • OH
    Oak HillsBikhor Cholim Cemetery Trust Perpetual Care c/o Union Bk & Tr Co-Trustee
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of the jewish federation of omaha.

Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
9
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Sri Lanka Helping Hands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…School District FoundationsYouth Development CentersPregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsSenior Support ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Addiction Recovery ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%2%<5yr10%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr17%26%35–55yr24%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%0%<5yr10%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr17%7%35–55yr24%83%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/186
the rest of the field
8%
1,066/13,926

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
152/154
Grantees still filing
104/154
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC — $42,631,701 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC+21 more — $2,171,951 · PhilanthropyBETH EL SYNAGOGUE — $2,525,080 · OtherBETH EL SYNAGOGUEFRIEDEL JEWISH ACADEMY — $2,479,625 · OtherFRIEDEL JEWISH ACADEMYTEMPLE ISRAEL — $2,093,023 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NEBRASKA INC — $1,379,254 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NE…+91 more — $4,530,450 · Other+91 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $2,774,774 · EducationBellevue University — $401,500 · EducationTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $354,290 · EducationCreighton University — $206,005 · EducationWESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $151,900 · Education+10 more — $91,550 · EducationOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $201,224 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $150,500 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAHA INC — $109,400 · Arts & CultureOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY — $93,700 · Arts & CultureASPEN SANTA FE BALLET — $85,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $75,350 · Arts & CultureOMAHA THEATER COMPANY — $62,259 · Arts & CultureBALLET NEBRASKA — $61,050 · Arts & CultureTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA CHILDREN'S TRUST — $38,620 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $136,027 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC — $557,157 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthA Way Out Inc — $40,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $30,000 · Health+8 more — $106,025 · HealthNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $553,575 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER — $50,000 · Animals+5 more — $47,459 · AnimalsMAKOR CHAIM USA INC — $250,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC — $92,500 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel — $61,000 · InternationalPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $55,500 · InternationalHEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC — $35,575 · InternationalHIAS INC — $20,740 · International+9 more — $104,260 · International
Philanthropy$44,803,652Other$13,007,432Education$3,980,019Arts & Culture$1,063,130Health$783,182Animals$651,034International$619,575

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC — $42,631,701 over 9y, 19% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $2,774,774 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOmaha Community Foundation Donor Directed Depository — $675,461 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC — $557,157 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $553,575 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBellevue University — $401,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTREET KIDS WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED — $385,000 over 7y, 79% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $360,779 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $354,290 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $338,300 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $272,610 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAKOR CHAIM USA INC — $250,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetCreighton University — $206,005 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $201,224 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION — $200,700 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NER YAAKOV INC — $196,000 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetNEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $184,203 over 7y, 35% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPolice Athletics for Community Engagement — $155,000 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetWESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $151,900 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $150,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEMA'AN ACHAI — $150,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION — $136,335 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $115,990 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES — $113,778 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetOmaha Botanical Center Inc — $109,985 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOPERA OMAHA INC — $109,400 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA — $99,058 over 5y, 10% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC — $95,779 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY — $93,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC — $92,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOMAHA SPORTS COMMISSION — $86,810 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetASPEN SANTA FE BALLET — $85,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $75,350 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $74,813 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT — $69,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetOMAHA AREA YOUTH ORCHESTRAS — $64,373 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC — $63,250 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOMAHA THEATER COMPANY — $62,259 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBALLET NEBRASKA — $61,050 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $61,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $59,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $57,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $55,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSRI LANKA HELPING HANDS — $55,180 over 2y, 43% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $52,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DES MOINES — $51,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation Donor Directed Depository ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Bellevue University ↗
  • Who funds STREET KIDS WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MAKOR CHAIM USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NER YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Police Athletics for Community Engagement ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEMA'AN ACHAI ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Botanical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds AM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA SPORTS COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood Foundati…The Lozier FoundationRobert B Daugherty Fo…The Holland FoundationPeter Kiewit Foundati…Weitz Family Foundati…The Hawks FoundationThe Charles and Mary …Richard Brooke Founda…Mutual of Omaha Found…Phillip and Terri Sch…Leland J & Dorothy H …
The Sherwood FoundationNE81.1× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Richard Brooke Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Phillip and Terri Schrager Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines