Skip to content
The Holewinski Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Holewinski Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$171kEducation$128kFood & Nutrition$49kHuman Services$34kInternational$25kEnvironment$20kReligion$10kPublic Benefit$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Corozal Belize Ministries$30,000
The Pachamama Alliance$10,000
Unite for HER$10,000
Platelet Disorder Support Association$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Corozal Belize Ministries: $30k → 7%project home: $3k → 22%she should run: $6k → 14%American Red Cross: $3k → 9%4 paws for ability: $1k → 9%Cathedral Kitchen: $3k → 12%COROZAL BELIZE MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%Families Forward Philadelphia: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 39% of The Holewinski Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Holewinski Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$274k · 8 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$274k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+12%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    Unite for HER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +96%
  • CB
    COROZAL BELIZE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +124%
  • PD
    PLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -79%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • SM
    San Marco Catholic Church
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
2
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
9
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
10
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
12
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bold Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels of Stevens Point. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $127,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY O…Unite for HER: $70,500 · HealthUnite for HERPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · HealthPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT AS…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · Healthuniversity of pennsylvania - penn medicine: $40,400 · Otheruniversity of pennsylvania…Rise Against Hunger: $37,000 · OtherRise Against HungerFOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH & EDUCATION: $20,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESE…San Marco Catholic Church: $10,000 · OtherSan Marco Catholic ChurchYMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY: $6,000 · Other+2 more: $5,500 · OtherCOROZAL BELIZE MINISTRIES: $50,000 · Human ServicesCOROZAL BELIZE M…TRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 · Human ServicesTRAVELERS AID SO…SHE SHOULD RUN: $6,000 · Human ServicesSHE SHOULD RUNTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Pachamama Alliance: $30,000 · EnvironmentBOLD HOPE INC: $16,920 · InternationalRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $4,600 · InternationalSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $2,500 · InternationalWater for South Sudan Inc: $1,000 · InternationalGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$127,500Health$125,500Other$118,900Human Services$73,000Environment$30,000International$25,020Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $127,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnite for HER: $70,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOROZAL BELIZE MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOLD HOPE INC: $16,920 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Blackbaud Giving …Ge Aerospace Foundati…Paypal Charitable Giv…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY14.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Holewinski Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Holewinski Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holewinski Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home