Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hodgson Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$380kHealth$335kReligion$276kHuman Services$250kAnimals$160kRecreation & Sports$65kFood & Nutrition$45kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Georgia Foundation$75,000
Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation$50,000
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$25,625
Martha O'Bryan Center$20,363
Church Tonight Ministries$20,000
Shepherd Center$20,000
The Horse Shelter$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Enable Madison County$10,000
Nashville Children's Alliance$10,000
The Gideons International$10,000
Scottish Rite of Alabama$10,000
St George's Episcopal Church$10,000
North Alabama Spay Neuter Ass Asso$10,000
Food Depot$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Food Depot: $10k → 12%The Food Depot: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%Enable Madison County: $10k → 11%Food Depot: $5k → 12%The Food Depot: $5k → 12%Food Depot: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
CA
NM
KS
TN
NC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+122%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +112%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $145k · revenue +90%
  • TH
    THE HORSE SHELTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • SM
    St Matthew Lutheran Chruch
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Aspca Veterinary Services of North Carolina Pc

Aspca veterinary services of north carolina, p.c. is a professional corporation that provides the veterinary services of qualified, licensed veterinarians exclusively to the aspca in north carolina. these services include the veterinary…

Animals
3
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
5
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
7
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

The mission of the Atlanta Humane Society is to improve animal welfare in the southeastern United States by providing quality animal services including preventative initiatives, education, advocacy and adoption of animals into permanent…

Animals
10
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

—
11
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
12
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Avenue Resource Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Church Tonight Ministries: $90,000 · OtherChurch Tonight MinistriesCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHScottish Rite of Alabama: $45,000 · OtherScottish Rite of AlabamaUGA BULLDOG CLUB: $40,000 · OtherUGA BULLDOG CLUBWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherSt Matthew Lutheran Chruch: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INC: $20,000 · OtherNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Ass Asso: $20,000 · OtherTHE GEORGIA BULLDOG CLUB: $20,000 · OtherSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS: $35,000 · OtherSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS+12 more: $126,300 · Other+12 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $295,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA…The Westminster Schools Inc: $55,000 · EducationThe Westminster Schools I…WELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $300,000 · HealthHighlands Cashiers He…SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $20,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INC+1 more: $5,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…THE FOOD DEPOT: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPO…CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HORSE SHELTER: $85,000 · AnimalsNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc: $15,000 · AnimalsKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10,000 · AnimalsNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $10,000 · AnimalsMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $30,363 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $25,625 · ReligionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$561,300Education$380,000Health$325,000Human Services$200,000Animals$130,000Religion$55,988Crime & Legal$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $295,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER: $85,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS: $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $30,363 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDiablo Regional Arts Association: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $6,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HORSE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds SOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds North Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Diablo Regional Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds KINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE DAY FUND ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Patricia S Hodgson Charitable FoundationGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patricia S Hodgson Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hodgson Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hodgson Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hodgson Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Hodgson Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hodgson’s filings →

More from the funding graph