Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hodgson Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$380kHealth$335kReligion$276kHuman Services$250kAnimals$160kRecreation & Sports$65kFood & Nutrition$45kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Georgia Foundation$75,000
Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation$50,000
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$25,625
Martha O'Bryan Center$20,363
The Horse Shelter$20,000
Shepherd Center$20,000
Church Tonight Ministries$20,000
St George's Episcopal Church$10,000
Central Presbyterian Church$10,000
Scottish Rite of Alabama$10,000
Food Depot$10,000
Enable Madison County$10,000
North Alabama Spay Neuter Ass Asso$10,000
Nashville Children's Alliance$10,000
The Westminster School$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Food Depot: $10k → 12%Food Depot: $5k → 12%Enable Madison County: $10k → 11%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%Food Depot: $5k → 12%The Food Depot: $5k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%The Food Depot: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
CA
NM
KS
TN
NC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+122%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +112%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $145k · revenue +70%
  • TH
    THE HORSE SHELTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • SM
    St Matthew Lutheran Chruch
    one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Aspca Veterinary Services of North Carolina Pc

Aspca veterinary services of north carolina, p.c. is a professional corporation that provides the veterinary services of qualified, licensed veterinarians exclusively to the aspca in north carolina. these services include the veterinary…

Animals
3
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
5
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
7
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

The mission of the Atlanta Humane Society is to improve animal welfare in the southeastern United States by providing quality animal services including preventative initiatives, education, advocacy and adoption of animals into permanent…

Animals
10
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

11
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
12
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Avenue Resource Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsEducation Equity LeadershipDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Church Tonight Ministries — $90,000 · OtherChurch Tonight MinistriesCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $70,000 · OtherCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHScottish Rite of Alabama — $45,000 · OtherScottish Rite of AlabamaUGA BULLDOG CLUB — $40,000 · OtherUGA BULLDOG CLUBWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherSt Matthew Lutheran Chruch — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INC — $20,000 · OtherNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Ass Asso — $20,000 · OtherTHE GEORGIA BULLDOG CLUB — $20,000 · OtherSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS — $35,000 · OtherSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS+12 more — $126,300 · Other+12 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $295,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA…The Westminster Schools Inc — $55,000 · EducationThe Westminster Schools I…WELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc — $300,000 · HealthHighlands Cashiers He…SHEPHERD CENTER INC — $20,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INC+1 more — $5,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $145,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…THE FOOD DEPOT — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPO…CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HORSE SHELTER — $85,000 · AnimalsNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc — $15,000 · AnimalsKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $10,000 · AnimalsNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · AnimalsNASHVILLE ZOO INC — $10,000 · AnimalsMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC — $30,363 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $25,625 · ReligionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$561,300Education$380,000Health$325,000Human Services$200,000Animals$130,000Religion$55,988Crime & Legal$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc — $300,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $295,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER — $85,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc — $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS — $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC — $30,363 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDiablo Regional Arts Association — $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHALLENGE DAY FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC — $6,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE HORSE SHELTER
  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT
  • Who funds SOUL SHOPPE PROGRAMS
  • Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds WELLPOINT CARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC
  • Who funds North Alabama Spay Neuter Assistance Association Inc
  • Who funds Diablo Regional Arts Association
  • Who funds CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY
  • Who funds CHALLENGE DAY FUND
  • Who funds KINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds NASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Patricia S Hodgson Charitable FoundationGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patricia S Hodgson Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hodgson Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hodgson Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Hodgson Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph