How much did THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Education$954kHousing & Shelter$323kPhilanthropy$123kInternational$18kHealth$15kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$4kReligion$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$628k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

groundcancer patients

2019

teensground

2020

childrengroundcancer

2021

socialmanyfunlivingchildrendevelopeveryone

2022

homelessnessteensfuneveryoneyouthempowercancer

2023

everyone

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k24 grants · $55k
$10k–50k6 grants · $114k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$3.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

JOHNS CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
CHAMPIONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$28,500
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$20,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA$15,000
CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION$10,000
COMMUNITY CHURCH OF DOUGLAS$10,000
EMORY WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE$7,500
ATLANTA MISSION$7,500
LADACIN NETWORK$7,500
CYCLE CONNECTBICYCLES AGAINST POVER$5,000
NARROW GATE$2,500
RETHINK FOOD$2,500
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$2,500
HOPE FOR NEW YORK$2,500
NO LONGER BOUND$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 77% of THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 13% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 24 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+41%

Still filing today

54%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY
8× · 2017–2024 · $950k · revenue +20%
LN
LADACIN NETWORK
2× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +38%
NG
NARROW GATE
4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +269%

Funded once

NC
NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE FOUND
one grant, 2020 · $100k
YO
YMCA OF METRO ATLANTA
one grant, 2017 · $5k
CANCAREgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Life House Atlanta Inc

Human Services

Camden Center for Youth Development Inc

Provision of educational and employment training services to troubled youth.

Crime & Legal

Georgia Rehabilitation Institute Inc

—

Chase Home for Children

—

Home Care United Inc

To sell and rent durable medical equipment to patients for home use, as well as provide home respiratory therapy and infusion services.

Health

Fostering Hope Ny Inc

Human Services

Children's Home of Bradford Pa

Journey health system provides organizational management, advocacy, financial and administrative shelter to its family of affiliated health care providers so that they may focus on what (continued on schedule o)

Human Services

Circle Home Inc

To promote healthcare services to selected patients, in their homes, regardless of ability to pay.

—

Rush Home Care Inc

Providing health care for women.

Health

Waccamaw Youth Center Inc

The waccamaw youth center is committed to providing the at-risk youth of south carolina with a safe and comforting place to call home.

—

Auburn Youth & Family Services Inc

To provide family counseling & community services

—

Goodwill of North Georgia Inc

The organization exists to provide employment, rehabilitative services, job training, and job placement services for persons with disabilities or disadvantaging conditions.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cycle Connect Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bucknell University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/29

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

25/26

Grantees still filing

19/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$953,500Other$638,281Housing & Shelter$322,700Philanthropy$122,750International$18,000Health$15,000Human Services$5,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hislop Family Foundation IncFL13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hislop Family Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CLAP FOR JESUS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 203885146 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CLAP FOR JESUS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Hislop Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hislop Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hislop Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE HISLOP FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hislop Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph