Skip to content
The Heyman Family Fund Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Heyman Family Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$44kHuman Services$44kHealth$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kCrime & Legal$18kEmployment$16kEnvironment$16kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$731k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank$5,000
All Hands and Hearts$4,750
Mississipee Center for Justice$4,450
Lifting Honduras Foundation$3,750
Madison Public Library Foundation$3,200
ADI-Negev Nahalat Eran Rehabilitation Village$3,150
Childsafe Coloarado$2,400
Open Temple$2,300
Jewish Experience$2,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Peak Parent Center: $3k → 9%Miry's List: $2k → 14%Foster Fete: $2k → 12%Warren Village: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WI
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 16 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
61

Total granted

$109k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+26%

Still filing today

69%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOPE PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +171%
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +129%
  • NB
    NORTH BRANCH NATURE CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $9k · revenue +256%

Funded once

  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -28%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +95%
  • TA
    The ALS Association South Carolina
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
7
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foster Fete. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
33/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADI-Negev Nahalat Eran Rehabilitation Village: $6,750 · OtherThe ALS Association South Carolina: $6,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,083 · OtherSafeHeart: $6,050 · OtherATHLETE ALLY INC: $7,300 · Other+55 more: $142,483 · Other+55 moreWORLD REHABILITATION FUND: $8,800 · InternationalWORLD REHABI…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $7,200 · InternationalJEWISH AGENC…Women for Afghan Women Inc: $6,150 · InternationalWomen for Af…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIO…The Pad Project: $2,400 · InternationalThe Pad Proj…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,700 · InternationalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,000 · HealthDana-Farber …ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,783 · HealthALS THERAPY …METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,500 · HealthMETAVIVOR RE…WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,200 · HealthWESTCHESTER …THE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $4,150 · HealthTHE BICOL CL…APROQUEN INC: $2,400 · HealthAPROQUEN INCT-Bird Foundation Inc: $2,200 · HealthT-Bird Found…JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 · HealthHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $6,600 · Human ServicesAll-Options: $3,400 · Human ServicesPEAK PARENT CENTER INC: $2,600 · Human ServicesWARREN VILLAGE INC: $2,100 · Human ServicesMIRY'S LIST: $1,950 · Human ServicesFOSTER FETE: $1,575 · Human ServicesNORTH BRANCH NATURE CENTER INC: $8,900 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $3,500 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentGROWING COMMUNITIES INC: $1,525 · EnvironmentTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC: $15,850 · EmploymentALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $12,050 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$174,866International$34,250Health$33,933Human Services$18,225Environment$16,425Employment$15,850Public Safety & Disaster$12,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC: $15,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $12,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH BRANCH NATURE CENTER INC: $8,900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD REHABILITATION FUND: $8,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetATHLETE ALLY INC: $7,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $6,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $6,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,783 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDHAM & WINDSOR HOUSING TRUST INC: $4,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $4,150 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTougaloo College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAll-Options: $3,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK PARENT CENTER INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTS MENTORSHIP PROGRAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pad Project: $2,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAPROQUEN INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION: $2,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $2,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMitzvah Fund Inc: $2,300 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetT-Bird Foundation Inc: $2,200 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIME IN CHILDRENS ARTS INITIATIVE INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOSTER FETE: $1,575 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGROWING COMMUNITIES INC: $1,525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Dove Foundation Inc: $1,300 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace Foundati…California Community …Jewish Communal FundImpactassetsincNetwork for GoodSilicon Valley Commun…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …
Ge Aerospace FoundationCT10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Impactassetsinc · Network for Good · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heyman Family Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heyman Family Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Windham & Windsor Housing Trust Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • North Branch Nature Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Mitzvah Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heyman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home