· Private foundation
The Hayworth Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $250k+1 grant · $333k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $332,683 |
| CONCERNED COMMUNITIES FOR AMERICA | $10,000 |
| INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN SWISS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ANIMAL CARE CENTERS OF NYC | $3,333 |
| NWH FOUNDATION | $2,680 |
| SECOND CHANCE RESCUE | $2,046 |
| MOTE MARINE LABORATORY | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE | $2,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA SPCA | $2,000 |
| ATLAS NETWORK | $2,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY | $1,500 |
| EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY | $1,000 |
| DO NO HARM | $1,000 |
| NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.
To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community
Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
Ccr is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the united states constitution the universal declaration of human rights. ccr stands with social justice movements…
To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The american constitution society for law and policy (acs) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan legal organization. through a diverse nationwide network of progressive lawyers, law students, judges, scholars, advocates, and many others,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin News Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 26% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONCERNED COMMUNITIES FOR AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Independent Women's Forum ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SWISS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds REAL CLEAR MEDIA FUND ↗
- Who funds DO NO HARM ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE & RACISM INC ↗
- Who funds VMTS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds New Civil Liberties Alliance ↗
- Who funds DEFENDING EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds FOR THE LOVE OF ALEX INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · The Searle Freedom Trust · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Adolph Coors Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · The Snider Foundation · Bader Family Foundation · Thomas W Smith Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hayworth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hayworth Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Hayworth Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.