Arizona · Nonprofit
NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN
NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN (Arizona) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $643,240 to it, the largest being Donors Trust Inc ($276,600). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,796 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,796 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Bader Family Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- The Dunn Foundationshared funders
- Human Rights Campaign Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $63k → $226k.
5 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 98% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 56% · 2022 34% · 2023 44% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
98% of NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $11k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Arizona, across 4 states.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $632k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Bader Family Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchVA · backs 42 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- The Dunn Foundationshared fundersDE · backs 63 organizations that share your funders
- Human Rights Campaign Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Small Change Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Christian Heritage Foundation Attn Michael a Kulpportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Lgbtq Task Forceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Summer Fund IIportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Onward Togetherportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Arca Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lebowitz-Aberly Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tikkun Olam Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporatedshared fundersPA · backs 96 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
95% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN?
- NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN (Arizona) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $643,240 to it, the largest being Donors Trust Inc ($276,600). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $643,240 in grants to NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN?
- Donors Trust Inc is the largest funder on record, with $276,600 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like NEW TOLERANCE CAMPAIGN find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing