Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hayes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
54
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Environment$2.4MInternational$1.6MAnimals$1.3MEducation$1.2MArts & Culture$945kFood & Nutrition$595kPhilanthropy$470kHealth$428kOther$0
02FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $630k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.6M
$30,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC$215,000
GIRLS INC SANTA FE$145,000
SAFE PASSAGE$115,000
MISSION BLUE$100,000
SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST$85,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$75,000
WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER$75,000
CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE$75,000
NEW YORK MARINE RESCUE CENTER$70,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$70,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$60,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$60,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$60,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $2k → 11%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $40k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $40k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $40k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $40k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $25k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $5k → 12%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $2k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $40k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $40k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $30k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $3k → 12%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $50k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $50k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $50k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
NM
NC
DC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 73 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

73 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
14

Total granted

$10M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+31%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $590k · revenue +213%
  • WC
    WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $398k · revenue +102%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $391k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • TO
    TREE OF LIFE FOR ANIMALS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • MS
    MARINE SKILLS INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • HL
    HAMDEN LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Community Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/65
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,500

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
41/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOWDOIN COLLEGE ALUMNI FUND — $444,500 · OtherBOWDOIN COLLEGE ALUMNI FUNDCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $329,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $237,000 · OtherHOTCHKISS LIBRARY — $211,000 · OtherNEW YORK MARINE RESCUE CENTER — $207,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $204,000 · OtherALDEA CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $180,000 · OtherMISSION BLUE — $170,000 · OtherFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $280,000 · OtherFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INCPARK & RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF SAG HARBOR INC — $195,000 · Other+49 more — $2,246,880 · Other+49 moreHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $590,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARACT PR…Safe Passage — $387,500 · InternationalSafe PassageGEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC — $270,000 · InternationalGEORGES MALAIKA FOUND…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $242,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIE…International Rescue Committee INC — $192,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue …COMMON HOPE — $190,000 · InternationalCOMMON HOPEWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $130,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN…+3 more — $27,500 · InternationalSANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST — $260,000 · EnvironmentSANTA FE CONSERV…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $254,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE F…SAVE THE SOUND — $250,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDAppalachian Mountain Club — $230,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Moun…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $228,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCE…Maine Island Trail Association — $176,500 · EnvironmentMaine Island Tra…Guilford Land Conservation Trust Inc — $100,000 · EnvironmentGuilford Land Co…+1 more — $50,000 · EnvironmentWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $397,500 · AnimalsWOLF CONSE…Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc — $280,000 · AnimalsEvelyn Ale…INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST — $200,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIO…NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $66,500 · AnimalsNORTH SHOR…THE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC — $192,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $170,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT — $148,000 · Human Services+1 more — $16,000 · Human ServicesSITE SANTA FE — $125,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $101,000 · Arts & CultureMAINE COLLEGE CIRCLE — $82,500 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM — $80,000 · Arts & CultureART LEAGUE OF LONG ISLAND — $57,500 · Arts & CultureGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC — $391,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,704,380International$2,029,000Environment$1,548,500Animals$944,000Human Services$526,000Arts & Culture$446,000Youth Development$391,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $590,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $397,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC — $391,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetSafe Passage — $387,500 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $329,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $280,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc — $280,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetGEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC — $270,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetSANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST — $260,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $254,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND — $250,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $242,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $237,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $230,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $228,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $204,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST — $200,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPARK & RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF SAG HARBOR INC — $195,000 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $192,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC — $192,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON HOPE — $190,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMaine Island Trail Association — $176,500 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $148,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE — $143,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSITE SANTA FE — $125,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $102,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $101,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetANDEAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetGuilford Land Conservation Trust Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCENTENARY EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION LLC — $92,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetSANTA FE FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTE — $88,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetMAINE COLLEGE CIRCLE — $82,500 over 7y, 19% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM — $80,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKWATER SAILING CENTER INC — $75,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetCAREER RESOURCES INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $66,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWE CARE SOLAR — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetART LEAGUE OF LONG ISLAND — $57,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetCatawba Lands Conservancy — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EQUUS EFFECT INC — $35,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds Safe Passage ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PARK & RECREATION ASSOCIATION OF SAG HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Maine Island Trail Association ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDEAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Guilford Land Conservation Trust Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Harris Finch Foundati…Gale Family FoundationJonathan & Kathleen A…The Frost FoundationThe Community Foundat…Seattle FoundationNational Philanthropi…Communities Foundatio…Aetna Foundation IncVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Harris Finch Foundation % Walter Brodie Burwell Jr · Gale Family Foundation · Jonathan & Kathleen Altman Fndtn · The Frost Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Seattle Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hayes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
  • Career Resources Inc — 35% of income from government
  • The Equus Effect Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines