· Private foundation
Harris Finch Foundation % Walter Brodie Burwell Jr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $154k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $242k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE | $114,178 |
| SITE SANTA FE | $78,225 |
| PRINCETON ALUMNICORP | $50,000 |
| MNM MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $47,400 |
| MOMA | $14,211 |
| FILM SOCIETY OF LINCOLN CENTER | $11,560 |
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM | $10,489 |
| STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS NEW MEXICO | $10,000 |
| MURFREESBORO HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ART INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| DAYS FOR GIRLS | $10,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF SANTA FE | $10,000 |
| FOOD DEPOT | $10,000 |
| NEW MUSEUM | $9,635 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSITE SANTA FE6× · 2020–2025 · $559k · revenue +289%
- IFINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM6× · 2020–2025 · $323k · revenue +45%
- MOMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $296k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- DDONORSCHOOSEORGone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -2%
- LALA AMISTAD FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +3%
- TATHE AMERICAN CENTER OF RESEARCH INCORPORATEDone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -73%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.
The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.
Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.
The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)
The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc and the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY PANTRY ↗
- Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LA AMISTAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS OF SANTA FE INC ↗
- Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CENTER OF RESEARCH INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Gale Family Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Sulica Fund Inc · La Liga · Jonathan & Kathleen Altman Fndtn · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · The Hayes Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harris Finch Foundation % Walter Brodie Burwell Jr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harris Finch Foundation % Walter Brodie Burwell Jr?
Find your warmest path to Harris Finch Foundation % Walter Brodie Burwell Jr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.