· Private foundation
The Hayes Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS | $80,000 |
| CABARRUS COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC | $60,000 |
| PROVERBS 226 | $20,000 |
| CONCORD SCHOOL BIBLE TEACHING ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHRISTIANITY AND SCHOLARSHIP | $20,000 |
| OPEN DOOR HOUSE | $20,000 |
| BETHEL COLONY OF MERCY INC | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN RECOVERY CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| CAROLINA CHRISTIAN STUDY CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION | $15,000 |
| RESTORATIVE TRANSITIONS INC | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY - CONCORD | $15,000 |
| BROOKSTONE SCHOOLS OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY | $15,000 |
| LIFE CHOICES ROWAN | $15,000 |
| WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR CHRISTIANITY AND SCHOLARSHIP5× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +60%
- CCCabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry4× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +163%
- FFFreedom Farm Ministries5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- ICIMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCone grant, 2023 · $20k
- MCMULTIPLY CHURCH CONCORDone grant, 2022 · $20k
- CCCROSSPOINTE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Redemption road provides housing, re-entry and transition services for men and women coming out of the criminal justice system. the mission is to provide to provide christ centered, bible based recovery from drug and alcohol abuse, damaged…
Crossroads and crisis christian counseling
Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…
Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.
Shalom House Ministries Inc operates a treatment center for women struggling with drug and alcohol addition. It also offers transitional dwelling for women who need a safe place after treatment.
Making Biblical counseling from licensed mental health professionals accessible to anyone who has need regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay.
Our Mission is to provide a Christ-Centered addiction recovery program to men and women, with the goal of helping them acheive deliverance from substance addictions, allowing them to become productive members of their community.
Reclaim individuals from a life of addiction, Rebuild them in spiritual sobriety in Christ, and Restore them to productive, Christ-like service in society.
To restore lives affected by incarceration. To reach out to people affected by incarceration, who will receive the love and provision that is found in Jesus Christ. To restore individuals and their families to our communities through…
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.
We will accomplish our vision by equipping our residents and alumni through teaching, mentoring, counseling, recovery and relapse prevention, and discipleship. we will help them to do this for the glory of god.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlotte Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Hope in Christ Counseling Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIANITY AND SCHOLARSHIP ↗
- Who funds Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry ↗
- Who funds Freedom Farm Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA CHRISTIAN STUDY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Open Hands of Davidson County ↗
- Who funds Zoe Empowers ↗
- Who funds WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Brookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County ↗
- Who funds Hope in Christ Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSS THE DIVIDE ↗
- Who funds FORSYTH JAIL AND PRISON MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET MISSION OF CHINA GROVE ↗
- Who funds The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds PURPLE HEART HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds MIRAVIA INC ↗
- Who funds HEALING TRANSITIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LIFE CHOICES ROWAN ↗
- Who funds STONE RIDGE FOUNDATION NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHY VETERANS ↗
- Who funds PAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds UrbanPromise Charlotte ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Ligonier Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Proverbs 226 ↗
- Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRESENT AGE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVEWORKS ↗
- Who funds FEED THE HUNGER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · True Homes Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Servant Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hayes Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hayes Family Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Hayes Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.