Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hayden Harman Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$343kRecreation & Sports$158kFood & Nutrition$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$102kPhilanthropy$82kHousing & Shelter$65kInternational$64kEnvironment$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$5,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$677k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH EAST COMMUNITY CENTER$58,423
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$14,159
Individual grant recipient$8,942
NORTH EAST MILLERTON LIBRARY$5,800
NORTH EAST HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
HVRHS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL CLUB$1,000
FRIENDS OF ROCKPORT ATHLETICS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $15k → 5%LEAD TO READ KC: $100 → 8%SHALOM FARMS: $5k → 9%LEAD TO READ: $100 → 8%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
KS
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$929k · 24 repeat orgs$445k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
56

Total granted

$929k
$437k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $288k · revenue +48%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +76%
  • OI
    ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
    2× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • NY
    NEW YORK COMMON PANTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
2
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
3
Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…

4
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
5
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
7
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
8
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
10
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
11
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Mark Wade Choate Iii Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCommunity FoundationsLand Conservation Organizat…Public Library SupportVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCancer Support OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringFallen First Responder Supp…Muslim Community Organizati…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Ymca Community CentersCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%37%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/59
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,701

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/56
Grantees still filing
39/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $287,663 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $82,008 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $63,384 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFLATIRON 23RD STREET PARTNERSHIP — $55,000 · OtherFLATIRON 23RD STREET PARTNERSHIPIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH'S SOUP KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · OtherMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $37,059 · Other+58 more — $394,191 · Other+58 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $135,989 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PA…+1 more — $1,044 · Recreation & SportsONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $25,880 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $17,853 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $17,114 · InternationalDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $5,000 · InternationalNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $30,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $17,500 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $14,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $1,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $55,626 · Crime & LegalGREATER RICHMOND BAR FOUNDATION — $4,500 · Crime & LegalTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $30,000 · PhilanthropyDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES — $20,000 · PhilanthropyThe Boston Police Foundation Inc — $3,000 · PhilanthropyARMENIA FUND INC — $2,500 · PhilanthropyThe Mark Wade Choate III Foundation — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RABBIT HOLE KC — $20,292 · Arts & CultureHAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC — $20,159 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $300 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,009,305Recreation & Sports$137,033International$65,847Food & Nutrition$63,500Crime & Legal$60,126Philanthropy$57,500Arts & Culture$40,751

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $287,663 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $135,989 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $55,626 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $37,059 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $25,880 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RABBIT HOLE KC — $20,292 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC — $20,159 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPBA WIDOWS AND CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $19,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $17,853 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $17,114 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMillerton Fire Company Inc — $15,830 over 1y, 26% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF — $14,719 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $14,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC — $10,196 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANDALL'S ISLAND PARK ALLIANCE INC — $10,041 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLondonderry Volunteer Rescue Squad Inc Londonderry Volunteer Rescue Squad — $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK — $9,971 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN OF HOPE INC — $9,971 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJerusalem Farm — $6,750 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNORTHEAST-MILLERTON LIBRARY — $5,800 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $5,175 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKITTYKIND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $4,868 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND BAR FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLAKESIDE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC — $4,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSHALOM FARMSINC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Boston Police Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetARMENIA FUND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUNDAY IN THE COUNTRY FOOD DRIVE — $1,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,497 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCYCLE KIDS INC — $1,044 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRICO POLICE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Gr's Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Health Forward Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hayden Harman Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc8% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hayden Harman Foundation Ltd?

Find your warmest path to The Hayden Harman Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph