Skip to content
The Haseley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Haseley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$307kAnimals$228kHuman Services$103kArts & Culture$103kPublic Benefit$100kEducation$44kPhilanthropy$28kRecreation & Sports$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PET COTTAGE$60,000
STACHESTRONG$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
UNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDA$10,000
CHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE$1,500
GREENTOPIA$1,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETERANS MULTI PURPOSE CENTER: $1k → 10%SPEAK UP FOR KIDS PALM BEACH COUNTY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$719k · 14 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$719k
$471k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+54%

Still filing today

36%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Pet Cottage Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $227k · revenue +563% · 60% of their budget
  • MILTON ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2022 · $28k · revenue +19%
  • SI
    STACHESTRONG INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MJ
    MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • WF
    WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
2
The Paul Robert Carey Foundation

Enabling people battling cancer and other diseases to obtain vital quality of life needs and services not funded by traditional medical reimbursements.

Philanthropy
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
6
Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundation

To raise funds to support mount sinai medical center of florida, inc., a not-for-profit acute care teaching and research facility, so that it may provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching,…

Health
7
The Mccourt Foundation Inc

Striving to help cure neurological diseases, while empowering communities to build a healthier world.

Philanthropy
8
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Inc

To promote and support moffitt subsidiaries through research, management, and other means of support.

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
12
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Speak Up for Kids of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Gardenaerial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $255,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARRIOR FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherWARRIOR FOUNDATIONUNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDA: $62,500 · OtherUNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDAWILMOT CANCER CENTER: $60,000 · OtherWILMOT CANCER CENTERPLUTA CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · OtherPLUTA CANCER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherSTACHESTRONG: $30,000 · Other+17 more: $69,395 · Other+17 morePet Cottage Inc: $227,000 · AnimalsPet Cottage IncJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $75,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Med…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $29,150 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S …THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MCDAVID…+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUP…CDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthPLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthSTACHESTRONG INC: $10,000 · HealthEQUICENTER INC: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthMILTON ACADEMY: $27,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $6,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $5,000 · EducationBEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationVETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesChallenger Sports League Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE GARDENAERIAL INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$656,895Animals$227,000Philanthropy$131,650Arts & Culture$100,000Health$89,000Education$43,500Human Services$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPet Cottage Inc: $227,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $29,150 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSTACHESTRONG INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ANDREA C CAMERON FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEQUICENTER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEndless Highway Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetVETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChallenger Sports League Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pet Cottage Inc ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STACHESTRONG INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREA C CAMERON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Endless Highway Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds Challenger Sports League Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENAERIAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owen Cheatham Foundat…Rochester Area Commun…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Owen Cheatham FoundationFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owen Cheatham Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haseley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haseley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Haseley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Haseley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haseley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home