Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Haseley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$307kAnimals$228kHuman Services$103kArts & Culture$103kPublic Benefit$100kEducation$44kPhilanthropy$28kRecreation & Sports$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PET COTTAGE$60,000
STACHESTRONG$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
UNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDA$10,000
CHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE$1,500
GREENTOPIA$1,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETERANS MULTI PURPOSE CENTER: $1k → 10%SPEAK UP FOR KIDS PALM BEACH COUNTY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$719k · 14 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$719k
$471k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+54%

Still filing today

36%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Pet Cottage Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $227k · revenue +563% · 60% of their budget
  • MILTON ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2022 · $28k · revenue +19%
  • SI
    STACHESTRONG INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MJ
    MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • WF
    WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

2
The Paul Robert Carey Foundation

Enabling people battling cancer and other diseases to obtain vital quality of life needs and services not funded by traditional medical reimbursements.

Philanthropy
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
6
Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundation

To raise funds to support mount sinai medical center of florida, inc., a not-for-profit acute care teaching and research facility, so that it may provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching,…

Health
7
The Mccourt Foundation Inc

Striving to help cure neurological diseases, while empowering communities to build a healthier world.

Philanthropy
8
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Inc

To promote and support moffitt subsidiaries through research, management, and other means of support.

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

10
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

12
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Speak Up for Kids of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Gardenaerial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%13%5–10yr21%38%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr14%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%14%<5yr15%6%5–10yr21%50%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr11%1%35–55yr14%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
2,535/18,390

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $255,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARRIOR FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherWARRIOR FOUNDATIONUNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDA — $62,500 · OtherUNITED VETERANS OF FLORIDAWILMOT CANCER CENTER — $60,000 · OtherWILMOT CANCER CENTERPLUTA CANCER CENTER — $50,000 · OtherPLUTA CANCER CENTERSTACHESTRONG — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · Other+17 more — $69,395 · Other+17 morePet Cottage Inc — $227,000 · AnimalsPet Cottage IncJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $75,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Med…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC — $29,150 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S …THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MCDAVID…+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUP…CDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthPLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · HealthSTACHESTRONG INC — $10,000 · HealthEQUICENTER INC — $7,500 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthMILTON ACADEMY — $27,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $6,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology — $5,000 · EducationBEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationSPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE GARDENAERIAL INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsChallenger Sports League Inc — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$656,895Animals$227,000Philanthropy$131,650Arts & Culture$100,000Health$89,000Education$43,500Human Services$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPet Cottage Inc — $227,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC — $29,150 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY — $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ANDREA C CAMERON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTACHESTRONG INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEQUICENTER INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEndless Highway Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetChallenger Sports League Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSTOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pet Cottage Inc
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CDS WOLF FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC
  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds PLUTA CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ANDREA C CAMERON FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STACHESTRONG INC
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Who funds BEECHWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Endless Highway Inc
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER'S CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds SPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENAERIAL INC
  • Who funds VETERANS MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Challenger Sports League Inc
  • Who funds STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owen Cheatham FoundationFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owen Cheatham Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Haseley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Milton Academy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Haseley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Haseley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph