Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$207kHuman Services$196kHealth$169kPhilanthropy$163kAnimals$111kArts & Culture$99kReligion$38kHousing & Shelter$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Binghamton University Foundation$13,000
Community Foundation$12,000
Catholic Charities$11,500
Jewish Community Center$11,000
Association for Vision Rehabilitati$8,000
Humane Society$7,000
BCC Foundation$5,000
Project Paw$3,600
Binghamton City Schools$3,000
WSKG$3,000
Broome County Dog Shelter$3,000
Hamilton College Alumni Fund$2,500
Mental Health Association$2,500
Guiding Eyes for the Blind$2,500
Children's Home$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $3k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 6%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $3k → 6%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $3k → 6%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $3k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 6%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $3k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 6%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Mom's House: $500 → 20%Family and Childrens Society: $750 → 20%Family and Childrens Society: $750 → 20%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SOCIETY: $750 → 20%Family and Childrens Society: $750 → 20%Family and Childrens Society: $750 → 20%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SOCIETY: $750 → 20%Family and Childrens Society: $750 → 20%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SOCIETY: $750 → 20%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SOCIETY: $750 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$878k · 39 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
5

Total granted

$878k
$16k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +120%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +83%
  • BP
    Binghamton Philharmonic Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • BU
    BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUND HISTORY
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • BU
    BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP F
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF BINGHAMTON
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health
2
Oswego Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the Oswego Health Foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic support for Oswego Health and its not for profit entities as they provide accessible, quality care and improve the health of the residents in our community.

Philanthropy
3
Cny Arts Inc

CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.

Arts & Culture
4
Hearing and Speech Center of Rochester Inc

To preserve the uniquely human right to enjoy communication for life by helping children and adults achieve dreams through innovative, caring speech and hearing services.

Health
5
Springside At Seneca Hill Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc., the sole member of Springside at Seneca Hill, Inc., is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health
6
Broadway By the Bay

To inspire, educate, and engage the community and local talent through the power of musical theater.

—
7
State Theatre Center for the Arts Inc

The theatre's mission is to unite the community using the power of our cultural resources and to provide a stage to celebrate and explore the arts together. we bring together, enrich the lives, and entertain people of all ages, races,…

Arts & Culture
8
Su Theatre Corporation D/B/a Syracuse Stage

Syracuse stage tells stories that engage, entertain, and inspire us to see life beyond our own experiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Daemen University

Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…

Education
10
Tri-State Community Health Center

Tri-state community health center is a nonprofit community health center providing affordable health care to people of all ages in the community regardless of their ability to pay.

—
11
Gardiner Library Board of Trustees

The Gardiner Library Board of Trustees operates the public library that serves the Town of Gardiner and the surrounding areas of New York State.

Education
12
Theaterworks Inc

Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Health Services Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Speak. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities: $91,500 · OtherCatholic CharitiesJewish Community Center: $83,000 · OtherJewish Community CenterASSOCIATION FOR VISION REHABILITATI: $72,000 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR VISION REHABILITATIHumane Society: $53,500 · OtherHumane SocietyBCC FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherBCC FOUNDATIONPROJECT PAW: $32,400 · OtherBinghamton City Schools: $27,000 · OtherWSKG: $27,000 · OtherHamilton College Alumni Fund: $22,500 · Other+26 more: $200,500 · Other+26 moreFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $122,000 · EducationFOUNDATION OF T…THE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $17,500 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF …THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $106,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNI…TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC: $13,500 · Arts & CultureBinghamton Philharmonic Inc: $13,500 · Arts & CultureGoodwill Theatre Inc: $9,500 · Arts & CultureTi-Ahwaga Community Players Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $6,750 · Human ServicesMoms House of Endicott NY Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesSPEAK: $9,500 · HealthLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · HealthUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · HealthTHE DANIELLE HOUSE INC: $4,500 · Health
Other$654,400Education$139,500Philanthropy$106,000Arts & Culture$40,500Human Services$33,750Health$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $122,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $106,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBinghamton Philharmonic Inc: $13,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGoodwill Theatre Inc: $9,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSPEAK: $9,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $6,750 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMoms House of Endicott NY Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DANIELLE HOUSE INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTi-Ahwaga Community Players Inc: $4,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE ↗
  • Who funds TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Binghamton Philharmonic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPEAK ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Moms House of Endicott NY Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DANIELLE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Ti-Ahwaga Community Players Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation IncNY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Jacob & Rose Olum Foundation · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · Bgm Foundation · Raymond Foundation · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Ahearn Foundation (Pfd) · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph