· Private foundation
Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $74k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $610k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AVRE | $400,000 |
| UHS FOUNDATION INC | $350,000 |
| MERCY HOUSE OF SOUTHERN TIER | $250,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| ROBERSON MUSEUM & SCIENCE CTR | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BROOME COUNTY | $90,000 |
| LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $84,590 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF BING | $75,000 |
| BROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC | $55,000 |
| BROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC | $55,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $49,000 |
| ENDICOTT PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INC | $6,000 |
| WINDSOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $772k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $483k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC7× · 2018–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +139%
- UHUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +38%
- LHLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $808k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- NINYSARC INC BROOME-TIOGA CHAPTER (ACHIEVE)one grant, 2018 · $300k
- CHCHILDREN'S HOME OF WYOMING CONFERENCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +75%
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD-FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue -12% · 49% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Build a healthy community by supporting the revitalization of the Binghampton neighborhood of Memphis, Tennessee, through housing and economic development.
To improve the quality of life for all residents of its primary service areas by focusing on meeting the needs of the low-income and disadvantaged population, and to promote the personal and family growth of its constituents as they move…
We work to eliminate housing discrimination, promote open communities, and ensure equal access to housing opportunity for all people in central and northern new york.
To further sustainable economic development in the city of binghamton by attracting new business, retaining and growing established business, building industrial and commercial capacity, promoting employment, and fostering entrepreneurship…
To raise funds to promote artistic, medical and other charitable functions.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.
To be a leader in community partnership building and to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.
Broadway housing communities seeks to actively engage and support the community we serve through a unique supportive model blending stable affordable housing, access to the arts, and early childhood education programs. (see schedule…
Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.
To strengthen the capacity of local united ways through their charitable human service activities to be leaders in achieving results that improve the lives of all new yorkers.
The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home of Wyoming Conference and the most unlike its peers is Punch Out Parkinsons Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BROOME COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ROBERSON MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Broome County Council of Churches ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF WYOMING CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD-FAIRVIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BINGHAMTON ↗
- Who funds THE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC ↗
- Who funds TRIPLE CITIES MAKERSPACE INC ↗
- Who funds FENTON FREE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN BROOME INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN BROOME ↗
- Who funds American Civic Association Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR VISION REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Junior League of Binghamton Inc ↗
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST WARD ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds DEPOSIT COMMUNITY THEATRE & PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Binghamton Philharmonic Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Broome County Inc · The Stewart W & Willma C Hoyt Foundation Inc · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Bgm Foundation · Miller S & Adelaide S Gaffney Fdn · Put God First Foundation · Roger Kresge Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.