· Private foundation
The Tsb Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF BROOME COUNTY | $7,000 |
| GUTHRIE CANCER CENTER | $4,942 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,643 |
| OWEGO GYMNASTICS & ACTIVITY CENTER | $3,600 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF TIOGATOMPKINS | $2,825 |
| GUTHRIE | $2,750 |
| BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,600 |
| CANDOR EMERGENCY SQUAD | $2,500 |
| HOPE FOUNDATION OF BINGHAMTON | $2,500 |
| TRI-CITIES OPERA | $2,500 |
| SPENCER-VAN ETTEN FOOD CUPBOARD | $2,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
| SRAC | $2,500 |
| ENDICOTT PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $2,500 |
| CHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
148 repeat relationships — 91 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF BROOME COUNTY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +20%
- TUTioga United Way Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +6%
- CECANDOR EMERGENCY SQUAD INC5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +193%
Funded once
- MIMETRO INTERFAITH HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +82%
- TCTi-Ahwaga Community Players Incone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
- FLFRED L WATERMAN CONSERVATION EDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Volunteer ambulance service
To provide fire protection services for the residents in the towns of caroga, bleecker, and piseco in upstate new york.
Brighton Volunteer Ambulance, Inc. endeavors to be a leader in emergency medical services and provide premier pre-hospital care by: respecting the values of our staff, our patients, and the community; (Continued on Schedule O)collaborating…
Unity house's mission is to empower and enrich the lives of people in recovery, coping with a mental illness, and/or diagnosed with a developmental disability. this is accomplished by offering supports and services in an inclusive,…
To provide emergency medical services and medical transport for patients in need of medical attention, regardless of their ability to pay.
The humane society of yates county exists to promote the welfare of companion and domestic animals through educational programs and initiatives that reduce pet overpopulation, enrich adoptions, and encourage responsible pet ownership.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
Provides 24-hour daily emergency services to the Town of Irondequoit. Also provides advanced life support to the Sea Breeze Fire District, as well as mutual aid service to areas surrounding Irondequoit in Monroe County.
To improve the quality of life for all residents of its primary service areas by focusing on meeting the needs of the low-income and disadvantaged population, and to promote the personal and family growth of its constituents as they move…
Providing fire protection, ambulance services and rescue services in the Onesquethaw Fire Protection District of the Town of New Scotland.
The organization provides charitable relief in the form of emergency shelter, material needs, and compassionate care for the homeless and persons in need in the eastern niagara county, new york area.
The organization provides behavioral health / social support services to residents in clinton, franklin, essex, warren and washington counties in new york state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Broome County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sassys Sidekicks and Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 312 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BROOME COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Tioga United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds CANDOR EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds Inspire S-VE Inc ↗
- Who funds Buffalo Bills Alumni Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds METRO INTERFAITH HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN TIER INDEPENDENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Broome County Council of Churches ↗
- Who funds Tioga County Rural Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds TIOGA COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INC TIOGA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds TIOGA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF BROOME-TIOGA COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ti-Ahwaga Community Players Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE TWIN TIERS ↗
- Who funds Endicott Performing Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FRED L WATERMAN CONSERVATION EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEPOT INC ↗
- Who funds CARANTOUAN GREENWAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Floyd Hooker Foundation · United Way of Broome County Inc · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tompkins County Inc · Raymond Foundation · Truman Mildred Faulkner Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · Tompkins Charitable Gift Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tsb Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Tsb Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Tsb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.