· Private foundation
Raymond Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k96 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHENANGO VALLEY HOME | $150,000 |
| GREENE CENTRAL SCHOOL | $36,923 |
| ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $18,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER | $18,000 |
| SUNY CORTLAND | $15,000 |
| SUNY BROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| MOORE MEMORIAL LIBRARY | $8,692 |
| GREENE LIONS CLUB | $7,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| LIBERTY UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| HARTWICK COLLEGE | $6,000 |
| GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| ZION CHURCH - BLESSINGS IN BACKPACK | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMOORE MEMORIAL LIBRARY3× · 2021–2024 · $42k · revenue +63%
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER4× · 2021–2024 · $36k · revenue +35%- NINYSARC INC BROOME-CHENANGO- TIOGA COUNTIES CHAPTER5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $100k
- UCUHS CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy
Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.
Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…
Brightpoint health drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers. brightpoint health delivers high quality, person centered, integrated care resulting in improved health outcomes for people, families, and communities challenged…
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
To provide quality health care services by operating diagnostic and treatment facilities pursuant to article 28 of the public health law of new york state. the center operates clinics in dunkirk, new york, jamestown, new york, gowanda, new…
To raise and manage funds in support of united memorial medical center and it's affiliates.
To advance interoperable health information technology to improve the quality and safety of health care and reduce costs. To advance, develop and operate a health information infrastructure based on a community-driven model open to…
Build a vibrant, world class advance battery and energy storage sector in new york state.
To promote a thriving arts community, essential to the quality of life in broome county ny and advance the awareness and value of the arts through advocacy, fundraising, grant making, services, and programs.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home of Wyoming Conference and the most unlike its peers is Amelias Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHENANGO RIVER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS ↗
- Who funds MOORE MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds GREENE LIONS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds NYSARC INC BROOME-CHENANGO- TIOGA COUNTIES CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds GREENE EMERGENCY SQUAD ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
- Who funds Rolling Horizons Collective Inc ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds GREENE COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds CHENANGO AMBULANCE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds THE DANIELLE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · United Way of Broome County Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · The Greater Norwich Foundation · The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · The Stewart W & Willma C Hoyt Foundation Inc · Ahearn Foundation (Pfd) · Bgm Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Raymond Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Raymond Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Raymond Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.