· Private foundation
The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber Charitable Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of THE HARVEY & ELIZABETH PRIOR SHRIBER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Binghamton University Foundation | $13,000 |
| Community Foundation | $12,000 |
| Catholic Charities | $11,500 |
| Jewish Community Center | $11,000 |
| Association for Vision Rehabilitati | $8,000 |
| Humane Society | $7,000 |
| BCC Foundation | $5,000 |
| Project Paw | $3,600 |
| Binghamton City Schools | $3,000 |
| WSKG | $3,000 |
| Broome County Dog Shelter | $3,000 |
| Guiding Eyes for the Blind | $2,500 |
| Children's Home | $2,500 |
| Mental Health Association | $2,500 |
| Hamilton College Alumni Fund | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +120%
- GEGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +83%
- BPBinghamton Philharmonic Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- BUBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUND HISTORYone grant, 2017 · $9k
- BUBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP Fone grant, 2017 · $3k
- TJTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF BINGHAMTONone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
The mission of the Oswego Health Foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic support for Oswego Health and its not for profit entities as they provide accessible, quality care and improve the health of the residents in our community.
CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.
To preserve the uniquely human right to enjoy communication for life by helping children and adults achieve dreams through innovative, caring speech and hearing services.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc., the sole member of Springside at Seneca Hill, Inc., is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
To inspire, educate, and engage the community and local talent through the power of musical theater.
The theatre's mission is to unite the community using the power of our cultural resources and to provide a stage to celebrate and explore the arts together. we bring together, enrich the lives, and entertain people of all ages, races,…
Syracuse stage tells stories that engage, entertain, and inspire us to see life beyond our own experiences.
Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…
Tri-state community health center is a nonprofit community health center providing affordable health care to people of all ages in the community regardless of their ability to pay.
The Gardiner Library Board of Trustees operates the public library that serves the Town of Gardiner and the surrounding areas of New York State.
Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Health Services Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Speak. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE ↗
- Who funds TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds Binghamton Philharmonic Inc ↗
- Who funds SPEAK ↗
- Who funds Goodwill Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Moms House of Endicott NY Inc ↗
- Who funds THE DANIELLE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Ti-Ahwaga Community Players Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Jacob & Rose Olum Foundation · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · Bgm Foundation · Raymond Foundation · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Ahearn Foundation (Pfd) · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.