Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$134kHealth$54kFood & Nutrition$52kReligion$40kHuman Services$37kCrime & Legal$27kRecreation & Sports$15kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
THE PEACE CENTER$5,000
PROJECT HART- COOKING FOR KIDS$3,500
GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CENTER$3,500
BELTON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$3,000
UNITED MINISTRIES$2,700
GREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS$2,500
PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
CLARITY INC$2,000
JASMINE ROAD$2,000
BELTON CEMETERY FOUNDATION$2,000
ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$2,000
BELTON AREA MUSEUM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $3k → 10%HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $3k → 10%HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $3k → 10%HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $3k → 10%HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 22 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$348k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+31%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +79%
  • JR
    JASMINE ROAD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +234%
  • UM
    UNITED MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
2
South Carolina Artisans Center

Cultural and educational resource

—
3
Wesley Commons

Wesley commons is a continuing care retirement community that provides value-based health services, including assisted living, intermediate and skilled nursing care, specialized care for alzheimer's and dementia-related illnesses, as well…

Human Services
4
Green Hill Center for North Carolina Art

The mission of green hill center for nc art is to promote the visual arts of north carolina by engaging a broad community of artists, adults and children through dynamic exhibitions and educational programs while providing a platform for…

Arts & Culture
5
Carolina Art Association Dba Gibbes Museum of Art

The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

Arts & Culture
6
The Museum - Greenwood Sc

The mission of the museum is to save, share, and celebrate greenwood history. to that end, the board and staff of the museum are charged to administer, operate and maintain a nonprofit museum in the professional and fiscally responsible…

Arts & Culture
7
Redux Contemporary Art Center

Redux contemporary art center is committed to fostering creativity and the cultivation of contemporary art through diverse exhibitions, affordable studio space for visual artists, meaningful education and outreach programs, and a…

Arts & Culture
8
Veritas Catholic Information Center

The veritas catholic information center (vcic) will proclaim the beauty, truth and fullness of the catholic faith in order to fulfill christ's great commission to "go and make disciples of all nations. organized and managed by lay persons…

Religion
9
Smith Medical Clinic Inc

To provide free healthcare services to low-income, uninsured adults in georgetown county, sc. the clinic envisions a healthier community where healthcare services are available to all regardless of their financial capability.

—
10
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
11
South Carolina Victim Assistance Network

The south carolina victim assistance network's mission is to ensure crime victims receive access to, and assistance from the criminal and juvenile justice systems and related social service providers; to improve the quality of services…

—
12
Greenville Art Guild
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anderson Interfaith Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BELTON AREA MUSEUM: $24,500 · OtherBELTON AREA MUSEUMPROJECT HOST INC: $20,100 · OtherPROJECT HOST INCGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CENTER: $17,500 · OtherGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CENTERBELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · OtherBELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCPHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $12,500 · OtherPHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHHARVEST OF HOPE: $9,000 · OtherHARVEST OF HOPEPROJECT HART- COOKING FOR KIDS: $8,000 · OtherPROJECT HOST- COOKING FOR KIDS: $7,000 · OtherBELTON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $6,000 · OtherPROJECT HART- PEACE CULINARY SCHOO: $5,500 · Other+5 more: $18,500 · Other+5 morePEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $47,500 · Arts & CulturePEACE CENTER FOUNDATIONBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $45,000 · Arts & CultureBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTSGREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $12,500 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE A…+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $24,000 · Human ServicesANDERSON I…HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $12,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE HO…UNITED MINISTRIES: $24,200 · ReligionUNITED MIN…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…JASMINE ROAD INC: $26,825 · Crime & LegalANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $14,000 · Health
Other$163,600Arts & Culture$109,000Human Services$36,500Religion$34,200Crime & Legal$26,825Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $47,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $45,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetJASMINE ROAD INC: $26,825 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $24,200 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $24,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOST INC: $20,100 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE: $12,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCLARITY INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBELTON CEMETERY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHE SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds JASMINE ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOST INC ↗
  • Who funds BELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CLARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BELTON CEMETERY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC20.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Elbert W Rogers Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Dorothy Hooper Beattie Foundation · Yeargin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hart-Oeland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph