· Private foundation
The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| THE PEACE CENTER | $5,000 |
| BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $5,000 |
| PROJECT HART- COOKING FOR KIDS | $3,500 |
| GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CENTER | $3,500 |
| BELTON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| UNITED MINISTRIES | $2,700 |
| GREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS | $2,500 |
| PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
| BELTON CEMETERY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CLARITY INC | $2,000 |
| JASMINE ROAD | $2,000 |
| BELTON AREA MUSEUM | $2,000 |
| ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +79%
- JRJASMINE ROAD INC9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +234%
- UMUNITED MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CCCHRIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $10k
- TSTHE SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +31%
- BRBLUE RIDGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTSone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cultural and educational resource
Wesley commons is a continuing care retirement community that provides value-based health services, including assisted living, intermediate and skilled nursing care, specialized care for alzheimer's and dementia-related illnesses, as well…
The mission of green hill center for nc art is to promote the visual arts of north carolina by engaging a broad community of artists, adults and children through dynamic exhibitions and educational programs while providing a platform for…
The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…
The mission of the museum is to save, share, and celebrate greenwood history. to that end, the board and staff of the museum are charged to administer, operate and maintain a nonprofit museum in the professional and fiscally responsible…
Redux contemporary art center is committed to fostering creativity and the cultivation of contemporary art through diverse exhibitions, affordable studio space for visual artists, meaningful education and outreach programs, and a…
The veritas catholic information center (vcic) will proclaim the beauty, truth and fullness of the catholic faith in order to fulfill christ's great commission to "go and make disciples of all nations. organized and managed by lay persons…
To provide free healthcare services to low-income, uninsured adults in georgetown county, sc. the clinic envisions a healthier community where healthcare services are available to all regardless of their financial capability.
The south carolina victim assistance network's mission is to ensure crime victims receive access to, and assistance from the criminal and juvenile justice systems and related social service providers; to improve the quality of services…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anderson Interfaith Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds JASMINE ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOST INC ↗
- Who funds BELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE HOUSE OF GREENVILLE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds CLARITY INC ↗
- Who funds BELTON CEMETERY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Elbert W Rogers Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Dorothy Hooper Beattie Foundation · Yeargin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Hart-Oeland Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.