Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hanson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$121kHealth$23kEmployment$21kReligion$18kScience & Tech$15kHousing & Shelter$13kCrime & Legal$12kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECOLOGISTICS$10,000
NAMI MONTGOMERY CO MD$6,000
TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST$4,000
CLEARN AIR TASK FORCE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CIRCLES CIPHERS$2,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$2,000
ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES$2,000
ICDI$1,000
FIREBIRD COMM ARTS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,000
YOUTH AND OPPORTUNITY UNITED$1,000
EVENSTON SCHOLARS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $3k → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $1k → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $750 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY EVANSTON: $500 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 29 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
14

Total granted

$271k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
-10%

Still filing today

76%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationEmploymentHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    ECOLOGISTICS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $39k · revenue +275%
  • TR
    TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +300%
  • GH
    GROWING HOME INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • RT
    RESOURCE TRAINING CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +40%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -44%
  • 3
    350ORG
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
5
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
11
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
12
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECOLOGISTICS INC: $39,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGISTICS INCTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $32,500 · EnvironmentTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INCNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $14,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $9,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC350 VERMONT INC: $7,500 · Environment350 VERMONT INCAmazon Watch Inc: $4,250 · Environment+3 more: $7,000 · Environment+3 moreCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $11,500 · OtherALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKESINTERNATIONAL CYSTINURIA FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CYSTINURIA FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESSINSIGHT MEDITATION SOCIETY INC: $7,000 · OtherINSIGHT MEDITATION SOCIETY INCNAMI MONTGOMERY CO MD: $6,000 · OtherUNITED CHURCH OF ROGERS PARK: $5,500 · OtherYOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC: $5,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUB ILLIOIS: $4,000 · OtherYOUTH ORGANIZATION UMBRELLA (YOU): $4,000 · OtherLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,750 · OtherLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INCINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON INC: $5,250 · OtherFAITH IN PLACE: $4,500 · OtherLEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC: $4,000 · Other+17 more: $22,000 · Other+17 moreGROWING HOME INC: $19,000 · EmploymentCURT'S CAFE: $1,250 · Employment+1 more: $500 · EmploymentTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $15,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,500 · InternationalCircles and Ciphers: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentRESOURCE TRAINING CENTER INC: $8,000 · EducationTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $1,000 · EducationEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $1,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthA JUST HARVEST: $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 · Health
Environment$124,750Other$118,500Employment$20,750International$17,500Youth Development$11,000Education$11,000Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECOLOGISTICS INC: $39,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCircles and Ciphers: $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budget350 VERMONT INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON INC: $5,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN PLACE: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $4,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY ADVOCATES FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA JUST HARVEST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECOLOGISTICS INC ↗
  • Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds Circles and Ciphers ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds 350 VERMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY ADVOCATES FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds A JUST HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT ↗
  • Who funds CURT'S CAFE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL21.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Evanston Community Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Forefront · Helen V Brach Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hanson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hanson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hanson Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hanson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hanson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph