Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hahn-Block Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$281k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$195kArts & Culture$173kReligion$108kPhilanthropy$100kHuman Services$55kAnimals$46kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL$110,000
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMES$80,000
NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE$15,000
ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY$10,000
WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC$10,000
OPERA EXPOSURES$10,000
MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$10,000
OHSU FOUNDATION$10,000
BANANAS INC$5,000
ST CHARLES SCHOOL$5,000
NORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE$5,000
LIFE ANIMAL RESUCE$3,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A HOME WITHIN: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
OR
NV
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 21 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$1.7M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

48%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $632k · revenue +142%
  • NE
    New England College
    7× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +19%
  • ND
    NEW DIRECTIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FS
    FOOD SHARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +34%
  • AU
    ANTIOCH UNIVESRITY OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • TU
    TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
6
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
7
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Best Friends for Life Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC: $632,000 · EducationLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INCNew England College: $118,639 · EducationNew England CollegeMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC: $59,000 · EducationMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MAR…+3 more: $42,000 · EducationOPERA EXPOSURES INC: $130,000 · OtherOPERA EXPOSURES INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $128,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODOHSU FOUNDATION: $112,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMES: $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMESIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANTIOCH UNIVERSITY: $55,000 · OtherANTIOCH UNIVERSITYNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · Other+22 more: $165,500 · Other+22 moreSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $30,000 · HealthWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $30,000 · HealthLIFE Animal Rescue: $25,000 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · AnimalsOLD DOG HAVEN: $4,983 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsBANANAS INCORPORATED: $20,305 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOOD SHARE INC: $15,500 · Food & NutritionNORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PAN: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$851,639Other$808,500Philanthropy$75,000Health$60,000Animals$35,983Human Services$25,305Food & Nutrition$20,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC: $632,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetNew England College: $118,639 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC: $59,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE Animal Rescue: $25,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBANANAS INCORPORATED: $20,305 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $15,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJacob Jonas The Company Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetZEUS' RESCUES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN: $4,983 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC ↗
  • Who funds New England College ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE Animal Rescue ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
  • Who funds BANANAS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds Jacob Jonas The Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PAN ↗
  • Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZEUS' RESCUES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A HOME WITHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hahn-Block Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hahn-Block Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hahn-Block Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph