Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hahn-Block Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$281k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$1.0MHealth$195kArts & Culture$173kReligion$108kPhilanthropy$100kHuman Services$55kAnimals$46kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL$110,000
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMES$80,000
NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE$15,000
OPERA EXPOSURES$10,000
WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC$10,000
MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$10,000
OHSU FOUNDATION$10,000
ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY$10,000
BANANAS INC$5,000
NORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
ST CHARLES SCHOOL$5,000
DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE$5,000
LIFE ANIMAL RESUCE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE CHAPIN SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A HOME WITHIN: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%BANANAS INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
NY
OR
NV
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 21 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$1.7M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

48%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $632k · revenue +223%
  • NE
    New England College
    7× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +19%
  • ND
    NEW DIRECTIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FS
    FOOD SHARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +34%
  • AU
    ANTIOCH UNIVESRITY OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • TU
    TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

6
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
7
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Best Friends for Life Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionProfessional Ballet Compani…Public University Foundatio…Independent K-8 SchoolsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Veteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%48%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $632,000 · EducationLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INCNew England College — $118,639 · EducationNew England CollegeMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC — $59,000 · EducationMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MAR…+3 more — $42,000 · EducationOPERA EXPOSURES INC — $130,000 · OtherOPERA EXPOSURES INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $128,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODOHSU FOUNDATION — $112,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMES — $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF THE CHIMESIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANTIOCH UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · OtherANTIOCH UNIVERSITYNEW DIRECTIONS INC — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $28,000 · Other+22 more — $165,500 · Other+22 moreSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $75,000 · PhilanthropyWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC — $30,000 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $30,000 · HealthLIFE Animal Rescue — $25,000 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · AnimalsOLD DOG HAVEN — $4,983 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsBANANAS INCORPORATED — $20,305 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFOOD SHARE INC — $15,500 · Food & NutritionNORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PAN — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$851,639Other$808,500Philanthropy$75,000Health$60,000Animals$35,983Human Services$25,305Food & Nutrition$20,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $632,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetNew England College — $118,639 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC — $59,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE Animal Rescue — $25,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBANANAS INCORPORATED — $20,305 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC — $15,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZEUS' RESCUES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJacob Jonas The Company Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAchilles International Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN — $4,983 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC
  • Who funds New England College
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE
  • Who funds LIFE Animal Rescue
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
  • Who funds BANANAS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE
  • Who funds NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC
  • Who funds ZEUS' RESCUES INC
  • Who funds Jacob Jonas The Company Inc
  • Who funds Achilles International Inc
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PAN
  • Who funds A HOME WITHIN INC
  • Who funds THE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC
  • Who funds THE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hahn-Block Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph