· Private foundation
The Groundfloor Media Foundation D/B/A Getgrounded Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUTH SEEN | $7,500 |
| HAVERN SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| MOUNTAIN IN MY MIND LLC | $5,000 |
| LAKEWOOD HOUSING CORP METROWEST HOUSING | $3,000 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDREN CASA OF BOULDER CO | $2,500 |
| FOOD FOR THOUGHT DENVER | $2,500 |
| YOUTH ON RECORD | $2,500 |
| AURORA ARAPAHOE BATTERED WOMEN'S CENTER | $2,500 |
| CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD COUNTIES | $2,500 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES-DENVER CASA | $2,500 |
| DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $2,500 |
| COBBLED STREETS | $2,500 |
| CITY YEAR DENVER | $2,500 |
| TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $2,500 |
| DENVER INNER CITY PARISH | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFood For Thought Denver6× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +9%
- PPLATTEFORUM7× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +8%
- DCDENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER6× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +78%
Funded once
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -23%- MSMOUNT SAINT VINCENTone grant, 2018 · $5k
- PEPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZEDone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.
To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.
The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…
Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.
Friends of the Children - Colorado has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.
To support the missions of child advocacy centers in colorado to help children and their families heal from abuse and neglect via training, technical assistance, collaboration and strategic partnerships.
Youth counseling and mentoring.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide a challenging environment where children can reach their full potential by enhancing their musical talents, forging diverse meaningful friendships, and sharing their joy of music with others.
VIVE addresses the health equity and wellness needs of many of Colorados low-income youth, who face significant health disparities and often lack access to engaging physical activity and health education.
Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Girls On the Fly. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
- Who funds PLATTEFORUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds HAVERN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Seen ↗
- Who funds Denver Inner City Parish Inc ↗
- Who funds COBBLED STREETS-HELPING HOMELESS & FOSTER KIDS MOVE FORWARD ↗
- Who funds Childrens Farms of America ↗
- Who funds HUNGER FREE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN FARM ↗
- Who funds Illuminate Colorado ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds WHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC ↗
- Who funds Rise Against Suicide ↗
- Who funds COLORADO METH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BLACK PARENTS UNITED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER CITY LAX ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES - DENVER CASA ↗
- Who funds Zuma's Rescue Ranch ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PAVE INC ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS ↗
- Who funds Amp the Cause ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 1 27 ↗
- Who funds CMDANCE ↗
- Who funds THREE BIRDS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds Spirit of the Sun Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECT OUR KIDS ↗
- Who funds MIRROR IMAGE ↗
- Who funds DENVER URBAN SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds Friends of Slavens School Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Anschutz Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Ima Foundation · Caring for Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Groundfloor Media Foundation D/B/A Getgrounded Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Groundfloor Media Foundation D/B/A Getgrounded Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Groundfloor Media Foundation D/B/A Getgrounded Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.