· Private foundation
The Griffith Foods Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $233k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEEDING NEW YORK STATE | $75,000 |
| RMHC | $57,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $50,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $50,000 |
| COMMON THREADS | $45,000 |
| GARFIELD PARK CONSERVATORY ALLIANCE | $30,000 |
| WORTH TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION | $29,000 |
| FORK FARMS FOUNDATION | $10,940 |
| CHILDREN OF RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY | $10,000 |
| KIDS AROUND THE WORLD | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| CAMP CORRAL | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGThe Global FoodBanking Network4× · 2017–2022 · $395k · revenue +47%
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY9× · 2017–2025 · $373k · revenue +140%- SVSOCIAL VENTURES FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $235k · revenue +22% · 96% of their budget
Funded once
- GMGLOBAL MIDWEST ALLIANCEone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -94%
VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -26%- MHMANY HOPES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +422%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Through philanthropy, empower current and future food and nutrition practitioners to optimize global health.
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
- Who funds WORTH TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Port Ministries ↗
- Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL OPPORTUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GARFIELD PARK CONSERVATORY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MIDWEST ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MANY HOPES INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Lost-N-Found Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · The Service Club of Chicago · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Griffith Foods Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Truckers Against Trafficking — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Griffith Foods Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Griffith Foods Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.