· Private foundation
The Glustrom Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hebrew Benevolent Congregation The Temple | $50,000 |
| Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Center | $25,000 |
| Daughters Against Alzheimer's | $25,000 |
| Atlanta Symphony Orchestra | $25,000 |
| American Civil Liberties Union | $20,000 |
| American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee | $20,000 |
| Big Canoe Chapel | $20,000 |
| Atlanta Community Food Bank | $10,000 |
| Back on My Feet | $10,000 |
| Theatrical Outfit | $10,000 |
| Partners in Change Inc | $10,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $6,000 |
| Compassionate Atlanta | $5,000 |
| Hark ALS | $5,000 |
| The Mussar Institute | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFAIR COUNT INC3× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +79%
- TGTHE GATEWAY CENTER INC2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +26%
- ACATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC2× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- EUEmory University - Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Centerone grant, 2024 · $25k
NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -88%- AOAdministrators of Tulane Educationone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Provides mediation services and mediation training for all manner of disputes, private and public, without the need for formal audication through the court system.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
To protect and empower immigrant survivors of crime and persecution.
Georgia innocence project (gip) is an independent organization that works holistically to free innocent people from georgia prisons, to assist exonerees with rebuilding their lives in freedom, and mitigate the causes and consequences of…
Breakthrough atlanta pursues a dual mission: to increase academic opportunity for highly motivated, underserved students and get them into college ready to succeed; and inspire and develop the next generation of teachers and educational…
New american pathways is an atlanta based nonprofit with the mission of helping refugees and georgia thrive.
To create safe and stable homes and families by inspiring the fight for equal justice.
Driven by our belief that High-Impact Entrepreneurs transform economies, Endeavor is on a mission to build thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems in emerging and underserved markets around the world.
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…
The Center for Civic Innovation uses local data and research to strengthen civic engagement and scale community-driven solutions in order to ensure that local public policy reflects the needs and the voices of people in Atlanta.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cool Earth Action Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAIR COUNT INC ↗
- Who funds FAIR FIGHT ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds Daughters Against Alzheimer's Inc ↗
- Who funds DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE GATEWAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds The Theatrical Outfit Inc ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE PAIDEIA SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds STAIBDANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Zoe Empowers ↗
- Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
- Who funds LEAP YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RIDE ↗
- Who funds CORNERS OUTREACH LLC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCRETE JUNGLE INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE MUSSAR INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds METRO ATLANTA COMMUNITY MIKVAHINC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · AEC Trust · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Glustrom Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.