Skip to content
The George & Patricia Evans Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The George & Patricia Evans Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$57kInternational$49kHousing & Shelter$30kReligion$21kAnimals$16kCivil Rights$14kEnvironment$8kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$425k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITANS PURSE$8,000
HUMAN COALITION$4,500
CARE 2 COMMUNITIES$4,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,500
SUMMIT MINISTRIES$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 13%HUMAN COALITION: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 10 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$136k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+17%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +40%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +125%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $14k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • TK
    TODD KRAMPITZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
4
Global Carbon Market Utility Governing Council Inc

Global carbon market utility governing council inc (gcmu governing council inc) is dedicated to dramatically reducing the amount of carbon dioxide and related greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere, thereby helping to preserve and…

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
7
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
8
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Gordon Research Conferences Inc

The gordon research conferences, inc. provide an international forum for the presentation and discussion of frontier research in the biological, chemical, physical and engineering sciences and their interfaces. *see schedule o*

Science & Tech
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastal Conservation Association; the most unlike its peers is St Joseph Bay Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYBETHESDA BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,100 · OtherBETHESDA BAPTIST CHURCHSUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · OtherSUMMIT MINISTRIES INCTODD KRAMPITZ FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherTODD KRAMPITZ FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRO LIFE HUMAN COALITON: $4,500 · OtherPRO LIFE HUMAN COALITONMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $4,500 · OtherMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCHUMAN COALITION: $4,500 · OtherHUMAN COALITIONOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $3,650 · OtherCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · OtherGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $4,500 · OtherGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENC…+2 more: $2,500 · OtherTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $28,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR…GIVE2ASIA: $6,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIACHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $14,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · AnimalsST JOSEPH BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,650 · AnimalsCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,750Health$45,700Religion$20,500International$20,000Philanthropy$14,500Animals$12,650Arts & Culture$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $28,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $14,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN COALITION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $3,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,650 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George & Patricia Evans Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George & Patricia Evans Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • International Game Fish Association Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Patricia Evans’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home