Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gaudio Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$12MEnvironment$8.0MHealth$3.1MScience & Tech$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MEducation$1.4MYouth Development$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+24 grants · $7.5M
$250,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$255M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP$700,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$500,000
CLIENTEARTH$450,000
MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC$400,000
LES AMIS DU CENTRE POMPIDOU$387,875
ST GILES TRUST$360,151
ALLCHILD LIMITED$360,151
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC$300,057
CITY HARVEST LTD$261,930
NEW HORIZON YOUTH CENTRE$261,928
SMART WORKS CHARITY$261,928
Individual grant recipient$250,433
ROOT CAPITAL$250,057
ACUMEN FUND INC$250,057
MOTHERS 2 MOTHERS$250,057
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 67% of grant dollars ($27M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 33% that went abroad ($14M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
NY
MA
OR
NV
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC

Beyond the US: 33% of all-years giving ($14M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$13M · 81 grants
France$709k · 7 grants
Bosnia and Herzegovina$20k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Gaudio Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 28%.

The Gaudio Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 38% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 45 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
18

Total granted

$34M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ACUMEN FUND INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +50%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +33%
  • MI
    MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $213k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $213k
  • TG
    THE GFF UK TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Natural Resource Governance Institute

Nrgi envisions a world where natural resources enable fair, prosperous and sustainable societies, instead of undermining them. nrgi exists because decisions about how natural resources are governed determine the well-being of people in…

International
6
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
7
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is African Collaborative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife in Crisis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCLIENTEARTH: $1,400,000 · OtherCLIENTEARTHST GILES TRUST: $1,378,846 · OtherST GILES TRUSTCITY HARVEST LTD: $1,142,962 · OtherCITY HARVEST LTDIndividual grant recipient: $1,046,147 · OtherSMART WORKS CHARITY: $973,780 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $951,056 · OtherRESURGO TRUST: $947,904 · OtherLES AMIS DU CENTRE POMPIDOU: $671,743 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $664,454 · Other+36 more: $8,508,868 · Other+36 moreACUMEN FUND INC: $4,000,057 · InternationalACUMEN FUND INCINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP: $2,274,999 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUPEDUCATE GIRLS: $1,000,000 · InternationalEDUCATE GIRLSCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $950,054 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATIONROOT CAPITAL INC: $945,112 · InternationalROOT CAPITAL INCVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $850,057 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND+5 more: $832,849 · International+5 moreMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $1,000,045 · EnvironmentMALIASILI IN…CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $950,057 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TA…NIA TERO FOUNDATION: $650,057 · EnvironmentNIA TERO FOU…EARTHJUSTICE: $600,057 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BLUE VENTURES INC: $600,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRI…OCEANA INC: $550,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC+2 more: $225,000 · EnvironmentPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 · EducationROOM TO READ: $700,055 · EducationMOTHERS2MOTHERS UNITED STATES INC: $1,100,057 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $650,000 · HealthNAMATI INC: $825,047 · Crime & LegalLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $250,000 · Crime & LegalROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $550,000 · Philanthropy
Other$19,685,760International$10,853,128Environment$4,575,216Education$2,700,055Health$1,750,057Crime & Legal$1,075,047Philanthropy$550,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $4,000,057 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP: $2,274,999 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS2MOTHERS UNITED STATES INC: $1,100,057 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $1,000,045 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS: $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $950,057 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $950,054 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $945,112 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $850,057 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetNAMATI INC: $825,047 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetROOM TO READ: $700,055 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNIA TERO FOUNDATION: $650,057 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $650,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $600,057 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BLUE VENTURES INC: $600,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $550,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $447,750 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $425,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS INC: $400,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $257,849 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEXTGEN AAA FOUNDATION: $255,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetAFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $250,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLIENTEARTH USA INC: $125,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART FUND: $55,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS2MOTHERS UNITED STATES INC ↗
  • Who funds MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds NAMATI INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds NIA TERO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BLUE VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Skoll FundCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Skoll Fund · Mulago Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Skoll Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Gates Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gaudio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gaudio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gaudio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph