Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gary Davis Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$363kRecreation & Sports$260kEducation$203kAnimals$98kReligion$83kHuman Services$74kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kInternational$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$379k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Duke Health$50,000
NC Veterinary Medical Foundation$25,000
MUSC$22,500
Chabad$10,000
Community Partnership Inc$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Hallie Hill Animal Sanctuary$7,500
Glenville Cashiers Rescue Squad$5,000
Cashiers Cares$5,000
Dream Chasing$3,000
The Episcopal Church of South Carolina$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUV MICHAEL: $2k → 17%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $2k → 8%CAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%Cashiers Cares: $5k → 18%CASHIERS CARES INC: $5k → 18%CASHIERS CARES INC: $5k → 18%Community Partnership Inc: $10k → 8%Cashiers Cares Inc: $5k → 18%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 8%CASHIERS CARES INC: $5k → 18%Community Partnership Inc: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $5k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$867k · 17 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$867k
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+11%

Still filing today

35%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +74%
  • COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +21%
  • RS
    Roper St Francis Foundation
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +85%
  • TT
    Trident tech college foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
2
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
3
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
4
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
5
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
6
Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To consistently deliver exceptional quality and service by demonstrating the values of respect, integrity, innovation, fiscal responsibility and accountability. to be an outstanding community healthcare organization, with service as our…

Philanthropy
7
Caromont Medical Group Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
8
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

11
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

12
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Veterinary Medical Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hallie Hill Animal Sanctuary F/K/a Hallie Hill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUKE - KICKING FIELD — $250,000 · OtherDUKE - KICKING FIELDDUKE - CARDIAC PROGRAM — $150,000 · OtherDUKE - CARDIAC PROGRAMMUSC FOUNDATION — $137,500 · OtherMUSC FOUNDATIONDuke Health — $50,000 · OtherDuke HealthTrident tech college foundation — $25,000 · Other+14 more — $126,000 · Other+14 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $125,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY…Roper St Francis Foundation — $30,000 · HealthRoper St Franci…+1 more — $5,000 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCASHIERS CARES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $4,500 · Human ServicesCAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesCHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC — $70,000 · Religion+1 more — $2,000 · ReligionGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC — $12,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY F/K/A HALLIE HILL INC — $7,500 · Animals
Other$738,500Health$160,000Education$85,000Human Services$74,000Religion$72,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,000Animals$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRoper St Francis Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCASHIERS CARES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY F/K/A HALLIE HILL INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIME FOR CHRIST INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLUV MICHAEL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC
  • Who funds Roper St Francis Foundation
  • Who funds CASHIERS CARES INC
  • Who funds GLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC
  • Who funds HALLIE HILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY F/K/A HALLIE HILL INC
  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
  • Who funds CAPE FEAR VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TIME FOR CHRIST INC
  • Who funds LUV MICHAEL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gary Davis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph