Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$211kArts & Culture$140kPhilanthropy$110kCommunity Improvement$100kSocial Science$63kPublic Benefit$35kHuman Services$17kInternational$11kReligion$5kOther$359k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION$100,000
AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE$75,000
COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY$16,500
AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDAT$15,000
THE TREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION INTL$10,000
LIFE CENTER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONA$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS - PALM BEACH$2,000
COUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS$2,000
HEALING TREE INTERNATIONAL$1,000
DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION$1,000
KEY FELLOWSHIP$1,000
GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
OH
PA
CA
KY
WV
VA
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$371k · 11 repeat orgs$580k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
27

Total granted

$371k
$468k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+4%

Still filing today

82%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +116%
  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +9%
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • WB
    WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $112k · revenue +47%
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
2
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
5
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
9
The National Foundation for American Policy Inc

The national foundation for american policy is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on trade, immigration, and other issues of national importance. the organization seeks to expand the debate over the…

Public Benefit
10
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

11
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

12
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. qi's staff and non-resident experts expose the costs and consequences of…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wv Law Enforcement Police K9 Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Substance Abuse TreatmentPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Land Conservation Organizat…Child and Family ServicesFallen First Responder Supp…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%42%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE — $200,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLEST JOHNS HEALTH CENTER — $60,000 · OtherST JOHNS HEALTH CENTERLIFE CENTER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 · OtherLIFE CENTER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+24 more — $66,500 · Other+24 moreAMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $200,000 · EducationAMERICA FIRST POLICY I…WEXNER CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $1,250 · EducationTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $111,925 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF C…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHI…+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIE…THE TREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TREE OF…MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementMMAC COMMU…+1 more — $100 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATIONINC — $63,000 · Social ScienceCOUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY — $31,500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Public Benefit
Other$391,500Education$211,250Arts & Culture$139,925Philanthropy$110,000Community Improvement$100,100Social Science$63,000Public Benefit$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $200,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $111,925 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATIONINC — $63,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY — $31,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWEXNER CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS — $9,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE — $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHeritage Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEALING TREE INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHudson Institute Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRIS GLOBAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWV LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICE K9 FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHonorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farrell Family FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farrell Family Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLP?

    Find your warmest path to The Fred Sands Family Foundation Co Winningham Becker & Company LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph