Skip to content

· Public charity

The Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep Foundation Inc

Founded in 1994, the foundation for the horse is governed and stewarded by equine veterinarians.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$2.8MEducation$475kScience & Tech$343kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$19kRecreation & Sports$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$8k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $1,103,258, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,508,919 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $405,661 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $302k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $779k
$25,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$160,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS$153,000
EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE$146,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$75,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$74,776
VARIOUS OTHER GRANTS 5000 OR LESS$64,470
THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$55,490
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$44,932
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$35,592
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$35,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$27,563
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND A&M COLLEGE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$24,996
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $100k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $20k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $20k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75k → 22%INTERNATIONAL VETERINARY OUTREACH: $19k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $38k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $21k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $28k → 16%TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $25k → 22%AMERICAN HORSE COUNCIL INC: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $20k → 19%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 18%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $55k → 27%RACE FOR EDUCATION INC: $36k → 17%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND A&M COLLEGE: $25k → 19%LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $49k → 32%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $100k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $20k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $19k → 16%TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $25k → 22%AMERICAN HORSE COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $42k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $20k → 27%RACE FOR EDUCATION INC: $29k → 17%GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $74k → 6%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $19k → 16%TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $20k → 22%AMERICAN HORSE COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $42k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $20k → 27%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $153k → 15%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $50k → 6%TEXAS A&M: $20k → 22%AMERICAN HORSE COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTICIONERS: $145k → 15%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $40k → 6%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTICIONERS: $145k → 15%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $26k → 6%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $115k → 15%EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $22k → 6%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $95k → 15%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $95k → 15%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $95k → 15%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $95k → 15%VARIOUS OTHER GRANTS 5000 OR LESS: $64k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
WV
MD
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 20 repeat orgs$689k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$2.9M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+30%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $938k · revenue +25%
  • EI
    EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $558k · revenue +562% · 42% of their budget
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $74k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • GC
    GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +30%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep Foundation Inc

Founded in 1994, the foundation for the horse is governed and stewarded by equine veterinarians. our mission to improve the health and welfare of horses is supported by the expertise of many world-renowned caregivers and researchers,…

Human Services
2
International Equine Information Inc
Philanthropy
3
Tierney Equine Foundation
Recreation & Sports
4
United States Equestrian Federation Inc

The united states equestrian federation's mission is to provide access to and increase participation in equestrian sports at all levels by ensuring fairness, safety, and enjoyment.

Recreation & Sports
5
Impact Horse- Connecting Humans and Horses
Animals
6
The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…

Recreation & Sports
7
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
8
American Veterinary Medical Foundation

The foundation develops resources to advance the science and practice of veterinary medicine to improve animal and human health. donations help support care for animals in need, veterinary student scholarships, research, and community…

Animals
9
Virginia Equine Alliance

The purpose of the virginia equine alliance is to sustain, promote, and expand the horse breeding and horse racing industries in the commonwealth of virginia. the alliance seeks to establish and support new and multiple venues for horse…

Community Improvement
10
Racing Medication and Testing Consortium

The mission of the consortium is to engage in research, education, and advocacy for science-based initiatives that promote the health and safety of the racehorse and the integrity of competition.

Animals
11
Horses and Humans Research Foundation

Through funding of rigorous research, outreach and education, horses and humans research foundation is a catalyst advancing global knowledge of horse-human interactions and their impact on health and wellness.

Animals
12
California Thoroughbred Foundation

To help develop veterinarians and fund research in Thoroughbred equine care and breeding within California.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Association of Equine Practitioners; the most unlike its peers is Teva Cares Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $938,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $254,359 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $194,510 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Texas: $160,000 · OtherUniversity of TexasUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $125,373 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $97,108 · Other+20 more: $572,772 · Other+20 moreEQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $557,855 · InternationalEQUITARIAN INITIA…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…University of Kentucky Research Foundation: $73,862 · EducationUniversity of…Cornell University: $65,723 · EducationCornell Unive…THE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC: $65,000 · EducationTHE RACE FOR …LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $64,900 · EducationLOUISIANA TEC…THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $55,490 · EducationTHE UNIVERSIT…Oregon State University Foundation: $50,000 · EducationOregon State …World Equine Veterinary Association: $60,000 · AnimalsGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL VETERINARY OUTREACH: $19,489 · AnimalsHEART OF PHOENIX EQUINE RESCUE INC: $17,000 · AnimalsSOUND EQUINE OPTIONS: $12,395 · AnimalsRETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD: $10,225 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $9,908 · AnimalsBROOKE USA INC: $8,338 · AnimalsFLEET OF ANGELS: $7,500 · Animals+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsAmerican Horse Council Foundation Inc: $90,000 · HealthTeva Cares Foundation: $14,499 · HealthTEXAS EQUINE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropySMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $19,220 · Arts & CultureSTANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $6,660 · Civil Rights
Other$2,342,122International$557,855Education$449,975Animals$174,855Health$104,499Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$19,220Civil Rights$6,660

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS: $938,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetEQUITARIAN INITIATIVE: $557,855 over 8y, 42% of budgetAmerican Horse Council Foundation Inc: $90,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $73,862 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $65,723 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC: $65,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $64,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWorld Equine Veterinary Association: $60,000 over 7y, 100% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $55,490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Horse Council Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS EQUINE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $19,220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF PHOENIX EQUINE RESCUE INC: $17,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTeva Cares Foundation: $14,499 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND EQUINE OPTIONS: $12,395 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD: $10,225 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $9,908 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $8,338 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLEET OF ANGELS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF EQUINE PRACTITIONERS ↗
  • Who funds EQUITARIAN INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds American Horse Council Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds World Equine Veterinary Association ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Horse Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS EQUINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL VETERINARY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF PHOENIX EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Teva Cares Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUND EQUINE OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds RETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane World for Animals IncDC13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane World for Animals Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep’s filings →

More from the funding graph