Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Forwith Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$314kReligion$147kInternational$58kPhilanthropy$47kHealth$16kEducation$14kRecreation & Sports$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAACS$95,000
Southeast Christian Church$35,000
Samaritans Purse$5,200
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Christian Health Service Corps$2,400
New International$2,400
Pioneers$2,400
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Christian Academy$600
Litehouse Maternity Home$500
Ronald McDonald House$500
Lipscomb University$500
PRLGA$500
Samford University$500
World Vision International$420
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Crossroads Mission: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$554k · 23 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$554k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+12%

Still filing today

39%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +60%
  • CH
    Christian Health Service Corps Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +178%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FO
    Friends of Kijabegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
4
Faith School of Theology

Faith's purpose is to mentor students for spirit-filled leadership in ministry, in light of the great commission. while academics are important, the classrooms are not the only learning place. through a combination of formal instruction,…

5
Christ Mission College

Cmc passionately develops a students god-given potential in a practical process of biblical higher education, discipleship, and practical experience for sacrificial service in the church and community to expand gods kingdom in the world…

6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

7
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
8
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
9
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
10
Trinity International University

Trinity international university is an institution of higher education that offers both undergraduate and postgraduate degree programs. trinity international university educates men and women for faithful participation in god's redemptive…

Education
11
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
12
Colorado Christian University

Serving god by providing christ-centered higher education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Mission and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Kijabe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsHomeless Services & ShelterEducation Equity LeadershipDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%76%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PAACS — $315,000 · OtherPAACSSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC — $131,100 · OtherSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC+31 more — $109,314 · Other+31 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 · ReligionThe Caring House Project Inc — $4,400 · Religion+1 more — $100 · ReligionChristian Health Service Corps Inc — $13,500 · International+1 more — $301 · InternationalFriends of Kijabe — $5,500 · HealthFHGR INC — $3,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF TENWEK INC — $3,000 · HealthCHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $1,000 · EducationSamford University — $800 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $758 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $100 · EducationCROSSROADS MISSION — $500 · Human ServicesLIFEHOUSE INC — $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$555,414Religion$14,500International$13,801Health$11,500Education$2,658Human Services$500Housing & Shelter$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC — $15,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Health Service Corps Inc — $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY — $8,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Kijabe — $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Caring House Project Inc — $4,400 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFHGR INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF TENWEK INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RADIANCE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PORTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamford University — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS MISSION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC
  • Who funds Christian Health Service Corps Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Friends of Kijabe
  • Who funds The Caring House Project Inc
  • Who funds FHGR INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TENWEK INC
  • Who funds THE RADIANCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds GREATER PORTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds Samford University
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MISSION
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository IncKY15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Forwith Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph