Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Forsberg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.7M
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Religion$3.4MEducation$2.3MInternational$182kRecreation & Sports$118kHealth$44kFood & Nutrition$26kHuman Services$8k
02FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $503k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.0M
$79,889
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX SEMINARY$2,232,000
ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$2,215,000
GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK$291,000
MINISTRY TRANSITIONS$261,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$149,000
CHURCH OF THE LUTHERAN BRETHREN$116,000
GOLF FORE AFRICA$108,000
ARIZONA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$79,889
CAMPUS CHRISTIAN CENTER$50,000
TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH$46,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$40,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$37,500
RAINBOW ACRES$36,000
MISSIONS DOOR$26,000
SUNSHINE ACRES$26,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RAINBOW ACRES: $36k → 14%RAINBOW ACRES: $8k → 14%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 14 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$6.0M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2.3M · revenue +17%
  • GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $311k · revenue +71%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $182k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • SA
    SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
3
Pacific Theological Seminary

To deliver biblically-based education and ministry mentoring through graduate-level degree programs.

Education
4
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
5
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
6
Sunarise International Ministries

Faith services

Religion
7
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
8
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
9
Indian Bible College

Ibc exists to empower indigenous christ-followers for ministry to the nations. in order to accomplish this purpose, the goals of indigenous bible college are: 1) to provide the necessary training for accurate interpretation of gods word so…

Education
10
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
11
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
12
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Seminary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,325,000 · EducationARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $2,272,000 · EducationPHOENIX SEMINARY INCGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $311,000 · ReligionGLOBAL TRAINING…MINISTRY TRANSITIONS INC: $276,000 · ReligionMINISTRY TRANSI…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $182,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PUR…InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $52,500 · ReligionInterVarsity Ch…CHURCH OF THE LUTHERAN BRETHREN: $136,000 · OtherCHURCH OF T…GOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $118,000 · OtherGOLF FORE A…ARIZONA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $79,889 · OtherARIZONA CHR…CAMPUS CHRISTIAN CENTER: $75,000 · OtherCAMPUS CHRI…TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $66,000 · OtherTRINITY BAP…CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $50,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUS…MISSIONS DOOR: $33,500 · OtherMISSIONS DO…SUNSHINE ACRES: $26,000 · Other+1 more: $14,000 · OtherRAINBOW ACRES: $43,500 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Education$4,597,000Religion$821,500Other$598,389Human Services$51,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,325,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $2,272,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $311,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMINISTRY TRANSITIONS INC: $276,000 over 2y, 85% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $182,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $118,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $52,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW ACRES: $43,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY TRANSITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW ACRES ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dallas Seminary FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dallas Seminary Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Forsberg Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Forsberg Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forsberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph