Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Forman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$85kReligion$50kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$15kEducation$11kHealth$9kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$479k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Birmingham Botanical Gardens$10,000
Independent Presbyterian Church$5,660
St Michael & All Angels Episcopal Church$4,660
Rotary Club Foundation$2,500
YWCA$1,500
Birmingham Museum of Art$1,000
Friends of the Children - Texas$1,000
Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation$660
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Friends of the Children - Texas: $1k → 10%Jubilee Park and Community Center: $4k → 14%Jubilee Park and Community Center: $4k → 14%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CO
WV
VA
NC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$205k · 19 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$205k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+7%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +154%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $8k · revenue +351%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Michaels & All Angels Church
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • CJ
    Camp John Marc
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • OC
    O'Neal Comprehensive Career Center at UAB
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
3
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
4
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Breakthrough Birmingham

Breakthrough Birmingham works with highly motivated, traditionally underrepresented students in Alabama to achieve post-secondary success while empowering aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educators and advocates.

Education
7
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Crestwood Day School Inc

Crestwood day school is a private elementary (k-6th) grade school in alabama.

Education
10
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
11
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
12
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Birmingham Botanical Gardens — $80,000 · OtherBirmingham Botanical GardensIndependent Presbyterian Church — $28,728 · OtherIndependent Presbyterian ChurchST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $17,680 · OtherST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCHRotary Club Foundation — $14,240 · OtherRotary Club FoundationYWCA — $14,049 · OtherYWCABirmingham Museum of Art — $7,500 · Other+9 more — $13,566 · Other+9 moreJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION — $10,334 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - TEXAS — $1,000 · Human ServicesMountain Brook City Schools Foundation — $3,979 · EducationTHE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $2,050 · EducationWashington and Lee University — $1,903 · EducationPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $1,250 · EducationBLUE RIDGE SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $1,000 · Education+2 more — $250 · EducationCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $8,106 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $606 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthAUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION — $4,866 · Recreation & SportsUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $4,000 · PhilanthropyCahaba River Society Inc — $3,300 · Community ImprovementGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC — $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$175,763Human Services$11,334Education$10,432Health$8,912Recreation & Sports$4,866Philanthropy$4,000Community Improvement$3,300Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION — $10,334 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $8,106 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION — $4,866 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Brook City Schools Foundation — $3,979 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCahaba River Society Inc — $3,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $2,050 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $1,903 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - TEXAS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $606 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamford University — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation
  • Who funds Cahaba River Society Inc
  • Who funds THE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University
  • Who funds PRESCHOOL PARTNERS
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - TEXAS
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS INC
  • Who funds GLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC
  • Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS
  • Who funds EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Samford University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dunn FoundationAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dunn Foundation · The Hackney Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Forman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph