Skip to content

· Public charity

The Forgotten International

The Forgotten International (TFI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the welfare of impoverished and "forgotten" people in the poorest areas of the world.

$761k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$175kInternational$130kHealth$26kHousing & Shelter$9kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $195,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $761,107 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $566,107 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $154k
$21,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shanti Bhavan$154,000
Kiran Educational Trust$21,000
Project Pearls$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SevaChild International: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $536k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $439k to organizations and $97k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$438k · 82% · 5 grants · 6 people

Stated purpose: General Support · Grants

South America$57k · 11% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: General Support

South Asia$40k · 8% · 1 grant · 1 person

Stated purpose: General Support · Grants

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1k · 0% · 1 grant · 1 person

Stated purpose: General Support · Grants

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Forgotten International’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 17%.

The Forgotten Internationallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 3 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$123k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
InternationalPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PROJECT PEARLS USA INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +72%
  • TF
    Tibet Fund Inc
    3× · 2018–2022 · $29k · revenue +70%
  • CC
    CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY DREAM ORGANIZATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $29k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • DW
    DIVINE WORD MISSIONARIES
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MO
    Margaret Okari Children's Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +74% · 28% of their budget
  • AF
    ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +549%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
2
International Community Development Foundation
International
3
International Humanity Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Asian Pacific Childrens Fund

Asian Pacific Children Fund supports orphanages in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Southern India in the area of education and medical services.

International
5
Asia Initiatives

To leverage the power of social capital to promote health care, education and sustainable development, striving to bring positive change in the quality of life in people in underserved communities. With particular focus on women and their…

Human Services
6
Swim for Change Project

Teaching swimming to underprivileged

Religion
7
Pradiya Foundation

Communities face the same problems all across the world sickness, poverty, social discrimination, environmental injustice, the list goes on.Though incredible organizations have been founded to help solve these issues over decades and…

International
8
Himalayan Childrens Fund

The Himalayan Children's Fund is a way for people around the world, and the west in particular, to connect with the lives of people in the Himalayan Region of Nepal, India and Tibet. HCF provides support for Thrangu Rinpoche's many…

International
9
American Friendship Foundation

AFF is an organization founded in 1995 to encourage and promote cross-cultural friendship and goodwill in developing nations. We do this through the development and funding of programs that address pressing human need for clean water…

Human Services
10
Together We Can Change the World

Alleviating poverty in SE Asia by supporting schools, providing safe drinking water, job training centers and related organizations

Philanthropy
11
Oda Foundation

The Oda Foundation supports rural communities in the Kalikot district of Nepal, focusing on healthcare, education, and community development. Healthcare: The foundation runs a primary healthcare clinic, providing essential medical…

International
12
Cdo Nepal
International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One World Childrens Fund; the most unlike its peers is Positive Change Can Happen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHANTI BHAVAN CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC: $154,000 · InternationalSHANTI BHAVAN CHILDREN'S PROJECT INCPROJECT PEARLS USA INC: $65,000 · InternationalPROJECT PEARLS USA INCTibet Fund Inc: $29,300 · InternationalTibet Fund IncCAMBODIAN COMMUNITY DREAM ORGANIZATION INC: $29,080 · InternationalCAMBODIAN COMMUNITY DREAM ORGANIZATION INCPARTNERS FOR BETTER FUTURES: $21,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS FO…Positive Change Can Happen: $7,543 · PhilanthropyPositive Ch…One World Childrens Fund: $6,000 · PhilanthropyOne World C…ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER: $10,000 · HealthMEDLENDORG: $5,700 · HealthDIVINE WORD MISSIONARIES: $10,300 · OtherMargaret Okari Children's Foundation: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentInternational Association for Child Aid: $5,100 · Human Services
International$277,380Philanthropy$34,543Health$15,700Other$10,300Youth Development$10,000Human Services$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHANTI BHAVAN CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC: $154,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPROJECT PEARLS USA INC: $65,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $29,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMBODIAN COMMUNITY DREAM ORGANIZATION INC: $29,080 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR BETTER FUTURES: $21,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMargaret Okari Children's Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPositive Change Can Happen: $7,543 over 1y, 100% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDLENDORG: $5,700 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetInternational Association for Child Aid: $5,100 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundation IncDC13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Forgotten International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Forgotten International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Forgotten International?

    Find your warmest path to The Forgotten International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forgotten International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph